2022
DOI: 10.1075/prag.1.4.02bar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory for dialogue in different modes of interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between dialogue and memory has been highlighted in studies on conversational memory . Some of the determinants of this kind of memory, such as interactional content (i.e., whether an utterance contains information about the speakers’ intentions and attitudes toward the addressee; Keenan, MacWhinney, & Mayhew, 1977; MacWhinney, Keenan, & Reinke, 1982) or presence of sarcasm (Gibbs, 1986), pertain to the features of the utterances produced during the interaction; others, such as speaker gender (Baroni & Nicolini, 1995), addressee distractibility (Pasupathi & Hoyt, 2010), partner status (e.g., interacting with a coworker vs. interacting with one’s boss; Holtgraves, Srull, & Socall, 1989), partner familiarity (Samp & Humphreys, 2007), or active versus passive participation in the interaction (e.g., Baroni, D’Urso, & Pascotto, 1991), pertain to the features of the speakers engaged in the interaction. Conversational memory also depends on the episodic cues created at the time of initial encoding (Horton, 2008; Horton & Gerrig, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between dialogue and memory has been highlighted in studies on conversational memory . Some of the determinants of this kind of memory, such as interactional content (i.e., whether an utterance contains information about the speakers’ intentions and attitudes toward the addressee; Keenan, MacWhinney, & Mayhew, 1977; MacWhinney, Keenan, & Reinke, 1982) or presence of sarcasm (Gibbs, 1986), pertain to the features of the utterances produced during the interaction; others, such as speaker gender (Baroni & Nicolini, 1995), addressee distractibility (Pasupathi & Hoyt, 2010), partner status (e.g., interacting with a coworker vs. interacting with one’s boss; Holtgraves, Srull, & Socall, 1989), partner familiarity (Samp & Humphreys, 2007), or active versus passive participation in the interaction (e.g., Baroni, D’Urso, & Pascotto, 1991), pertain to the features of the speakers engaged in the interaction. Conversational memory also depends on the episodic cues created at the time of initial encoding (Horton, 2008; Horton & Gerrig, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%