1994
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(94)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory efficient ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better method is to use low-precision approximations to the document weights, which can reduce each document length to around six bits without significantly affecting retrieval effectiveness or retrieval time [27]. Furthermore, in a multi-user environment the cost of storing the weights can be amortised over all active processes, since the weights are static and can be stored in shared memory.…”
Section: Ranked Query Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better method is to use low-precision approximations to the document weights, which can reduce each document length to around six bits without significantly affecting retrieval effectiveness or retrieval time [27]. Furthermore, in a multi-user environment the cost of storing the weights can be amortised over all active processes, since the weights are static and can be stored in shared memory.…”
Section: Ranked Query Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problematically the impact values are not integers. Consequently, impact values are quantized into integers [8,2]; in practice a simple linear scaling to fit in one byte is effective.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postings lists can be very long and can require a substantial amount of processing time. Various techniques have been developed to manage their size including compression [10,4] and static pruning; and various techniques have been developed to decrease processing time including impact ordering [8] and dynamic pruning [2]. However, little attention has been give to the very large number of short postings lists typically seen in an inverted index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moffat et al [4] observed that approximations to components of the ranking function were as effective as exact values (the document length can be approximate). Anh et al [1] observed that the term / document weight could be precomputed and stored in the impact ordered index; during indexing they evaluated the ranking function for every term with respect to every document and stored that result rather than term frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such pre-calculated values are floating point and do not compress well, so Moffat et al [4] quantized these scores into b-bit integers. Several approximations were explored by Anh et al [1], who show that either a linear mapping, or alternatively skewing to provide extra granularity at the lower scores works well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%