2010
DOI: 10.1177/1362361309358700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory and the self in autism

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
6
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first, and the interpretation that we favour, is that individuals with ASD genuinely do benefit from self-enactment and that a more general episodic deficit explains previous findings of a diminished enactment effect, whereby differences between groups are quantitative, rather than qualitative in nature (see RUNNING HEAD: Experienced eyewitness events in ASD 23 Lind, 2010). The second is that the effect is diminished in ASD, but that we failed to detect a difference in the present paradigm.…”
Section: Self-enactment Effectcontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first, and the interpretation that we favour, is that individuals with ASD genuinely do benefit from self-enactment and that a more general episodic deficit explains previous findings of a diminished enactment effect, whereby differences between groups are quantitative, rather than qualitative in nature (see RUNNING HEAD: Experienced eyewitness events in ASD 23 Lind, 2010). The second is that the effect is diminished in ASD, but that we failed to detect a difference in the present paradigm.…”
Section: Self-enactment Effectcontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Of the studies with adults, none to date have used a live eyewitness event, or an event in which the witness has actively participated. This is pertinent given that it is now well established that individuals with ASD experience difficulties in reflecting on the self (e.g., Crane et al, 2009, and see Lind, 2010), which extend to impairments in episodic memory (e.g., Crane & Goddard, 2008;Klein et al, 1999). Indeed, a number of studies have demonstrated that individuals with ASD experience particular difficulties recalling specific and personally experienced autobiographical events (e.g., Bruck et al, 2007;Goddard, Howlin, Dritschel & Patel, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further consideration is the tendency for individuals with ASD to minimize the severity of their autistic traits. This minimization is likely due to limitations in the capacity for selfreflection, inaccurate self-perception with regard to social competence (Johnson, Filliter, & Murphy, 2009) and under-elaborated psychological self-concept (Lind, 2010). Alternatively, denial of difficulties may be an adaptive coping strategy or safeguard for self esteem (Attwood, 2007).…”
Section: Recognizing Asd Within the Criminal Justice Systemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such difficulties are related to a reduction in autonoetic awareness (the conscious re-experiencing of a past event) in this group that is compensated for by an increase in noetic awareness (an awareness of information in the absence of the recollection of the acquisition of that knowledge) (Bowler et al,PAST AND FUTURE THINKING IN ASD 6 2007; Tanweer, Rathbone, & Souchay, 2010). Autobiographical memory difficulties have also been linked to problems in relation to self-referential cognition in this group (e.g., Crane et al, 2009;Lind, 2010). In particular, adults with ASD do not appear to use information pertaining to the self to organise their database of personally experienced events (Crane et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%