2021
DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2021.1962871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory and credibility perceptions of alcohol and other drug intoxicated witnesses and victims of crime

Abstract: Research into juror perceptions regarding the impact of intoxication on eyewitness memory and credibility is scarce for substances other than alcohol. However, jurors are frequently told to draw on their personal beliefs and experience with intoxicating substances to infer their impact on the case. It is therefore important to investigate laypeople's perceptions regarding witness and victim intoxication across a range of substances, and whether these perceptions are associated with substance familiarity. Parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that witnesses intoxicated by amphetamines were perceived more negatively (i.e., lower credibility/cognitive competence) than sober witnesses is consistent with previous survey data. For instance, respondents in the study by Monds et al (2022b) believed that witnesses intoxicated by amphetamines would have poorer memories than sober witnesses and that amphetamine intoxication would negatively impact witness credibility. Therefore, the effect of witness amphetamine intoxication on perceptions might be driven by our participants' beliefs about how amphetamines impair a witness' ability to give accurate testimony, which in turn has a detrimental impact on credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The finding that witnesses intoxicated by amphetamines were perceived more negatively (i.e., lower credibility/cognitive competence) than sober witnesses is consistent with previous survey data. For instance, respondents in the study by Monds et al (2022b) believed that witnesses intoxicated by amphetamines would have poorer memories than sober witnesses and that amphetamine intoxication would negatively impact witness credibility. Therefore, the effect of witness amphetamine intoxication on perceptions might be driven by our participants' beliefs about how amphetamines impair a witness' ability to give accurate testimony, which in turn has a detrimental impact on credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of an effect of cannabis intoxication on witness perceptions might reflect laypeople's uncertainty regarding the effect of cannabis on memory. For example, Monds et al (2022b) found that while respondents believed that a cannabis-intoxicated witness would be less credible than a sober witness, these same respondents also stated that they were uncertain about how cannabis would affect eyewitness memory. Perhaps our participants were also generally uncertain about how cannabis influences memory (as per previous research), and thus were unsure about the credibility of a cannabis-intoxicated versus sober witness in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past, the alcohol and memory literature have often found evidence of detrimental memory impairments being caused by alcohol-intoxication (e.g., Parker et al, 1976;Mintzer, 2007). This provides a rationale for the prevalent perception among legal practitioners (Kassin et al, 2001;Evans et al, 2009;Crossland et al, 2018;Hagsand et al, 2021Monds et al, 2021a) and lay people (Evans and Schreiber Compo, 2010;Monds et al, 2021b) that intoxicated witnesses are less credible than sober witnesses. However, the effects of memory impairments caused by alcohol-intoxication have often not been replicated within the applied legal context of eyewitness memory (see Altman et al, 2019, for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol intoxication in witnesses and victims is common (Crossland et al 2018;Evans et al 2009;Monds et al 2021) and such witnesses often play a comparable role to their sober counterparts in criminal investigations (Palmer et al 2013). Both were just as likely to make a suspect ID and to provide a suspect description.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%