2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1904.02639
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concretely, we encode the spatial information in multi-sensor time-series signals into the low-dimensional representation via Deep Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE). In order to reduce the effect of noisy data, some existing works have tried to add Memory module [24] or Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [23]. In our proposed method, we simplify these modules into penalty item, which called Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) penalty.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concretely, we encode the spatial information in multi-sensor time-series signals into the low-dimensional representation via Deep Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE). In order to reduce the effect of noisy data, some existing works have tried to add Memory module [24] or Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [23]. In our proposed method, we simplify these modules into penalty item, which called Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) penalty.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally assumed that the compression of anomalous samples is different from that on normal samples, and the reconstruction error becomes higher for these anomalous samples. In reality, being influenced by the high complexity of model and the noise of data, the reconstruction error for the abnormal input could also be fit so well by the training model [23], [24]. That is, the model is robust to noise and anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zero-shot anomaly detection methods assume that the conditional generative model [3,15,31,26,25,21,14]) can only reconstruct normal data. Hence, when presented with an abnormal test image, the model produces a large reconstruction error.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though they are often effective, these approaches still need a fairly high number of abnormal training images. Alternatively, zero-shot anomaly detection methods [3,15,31,14] Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation