Abstract:This paper reads Bong Joon-ho's Memories of Murder (2003) as a commentary on the possibilities of historicity at the proverbial end of history. It argues that the film ultimately instantiates a kind of spectral historiography that comments on the archive's possibility as well as its limits.
“…For this reason, Law number 43, 2009 was issued as an effort to involve universities in managing their archives for research and academic purposes. Blendon (1975), Nesmith (2002), Jeon (2011), andBeard (2018) showed the importance of university archives in helping the realization of academic research at universities. This is understandable because archives are actual information about institutional development policies and programs.…”
Section: Archives As Information Infrastructure and Their Urgency Toward Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the issue of the university's three pillars to that of administration, archives are an inseparable element. The archive is a record of every event, both small and large, which clearly describes the event in question (Jeon, 2011;Sande, Verborgh, Hochstenbach, & Sompel, 2018). These archival documents exist in various forms, including deeds, certificates, correspondence, minutes, reports, and even certain publications, as well as other documents that are not publicly published.…”
Section: As Primary Documents For Institutional Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archives are records of individual and collective memories (Jeon, 2011;Sande, Verborgh, Hochstenbach, & Sompel, 2018), in the form of dynamic and static archives (Indonesia, 2009). Dynamic archives are actively used in personal and group activities so that their existence is…”
This research was conducted to investigate archives as information infrastructure in research. This term is used because archives are seen as the primary source for research. Thus, it is very fundamental and urgent for researchers regarding the data to be used and their accuracy is reliable. The research used a qualitative descriptive method in the frame of a constructivist approach in reading the phenomena of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Archives. Data collection was carried out using three main techniques, namely interview, observation, and documentation. The results of the study found three important issues related to the existence of archives as information infrastructure on research, i.e. archives as a means of historical preservation, primary document, and research development capital. As a curator of history, it seems that its function is very important in historical research because its birth was not intended to produce historical materials, but was born by itself following the interaction of the people. As a primary document, archives are important because they were born simultaneously with events, not from the stories of social actors. As for the framework of research development capital, archives are a source that has a high degree of accuracy, so that its function in research is very important to produce qualified research.
“…For this reason, Law number 43, 2009 was issued as an effort to involve universities in managing their archives for research and academic purposes. Blendon (1975), Nesmith (2002), Jeon (2011), andBeard (2018) showed the importance of university archives in helping the realization of academic research at universities. This is understandable because archives are actual information about institutional development policies and programs.…”
Section: Archives As Information Infrastructure and Their Urgency Toward Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the issue of the university's three pillars to that of administration, archives are an inseparable element. The archive is a record of every event, both small and large, which clearly describes the event in question (Jeon, 2011;Sande, Verborgh, Hochstenbach, & Sompel, 2018). These archival documents exist in various forms, including deeds, certificates, correspondence, minutes, reports, and even certain publications, as well as other documents that are not publicly published.…”
Section: As Primary Documents For Institutional Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archives are records of individual and collective memories (Jeon, 2011;Sande, Verborgh, Hochstenbach, & Sompel, 2018), in the form of dynamic and static archives (Indonesia, 2009). Dynamic archives are actively used in personal and group activities so that their existence is…”
This research was conducted to investigate archives as information infrastructure in research. This term is used because archives are seen as the primary source for research. Thus, it is very fundamental and urgent for researchers regarding the data to be used and their accuracy is reliable. The research used a qualitative descriptive method in the frame of a constructivist approach in reading the phenomena of UIN Sunan Kalijaga Archives. Data collection was carried out using three main techniques, namely interview, observation, and documentation. The results of the study found three important issues related to the existence of archives as information infrastructure on research, i.e. archives as a means of historical preservation, primary document, and research development capital. As a curator of history, it seems that its function is very important in historical research because its birth was not intended to produce historical materials, but was born by itself following the interaction of the people. As a primary document, archives are important because they were born simultaneously with events, not from the stories of social actors. As for the framework of research development capital, archives are a source that has a high degree of accuracy, so that its function in research is very important to produce qualified research.
“…Therefore, archivists and records managers must demonstrate professional competence that will enhance their bargaining position within the organization and society as cross-disciplinary custodians of records (Segaetsho T and Moloi J, 2019, pp. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Furthermore, according to Mosweu dan Ngoepe (2019), Knowledge and skills for professionals in archive and record management are indeed crucial to ensure that archives and records remain accessible and guarantee accountability, governance, and social wisdom (Mosweu O and Ngoepe M, 2019, pp.…”
This article discusses the potential application of the total archives theory in the context of building collective memory and cultural identity at the Archives Management Unit (UPT Kearsipan) of Lampung University. The preservation and management of archives play a crucial role in preserving the history and culture of an educational institution, especially a university. This research aims to identify the challenges and opportunities faced by the Archives Management Unit of Lampung University in an effort to build collective memory and campus cultural identity. By applying the total archives theory approach, this study seeks ways to enhance a more holistic archive management approach involving all stakeholders and maximizing the use of technology in the process. The research methodology involves document analysis, interviews with UPT Kearsipan staff, and surveys of archive users. The results of the research indicate that the application of the total archives theory holds great potential in building collective memory and cultural identity at Lampung University. By leveraging technology, UPT Kearsipan can be more effective in managing, accessing, and documenting the archives, thus enabling broader access for stakeholders to explore the history and culture of the campus.
Keywords: collective memory, total archives theory, UPT Kearsipan Universitas Lampung
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.