Memories of Development: Le Système colonial dévoilé and the Performance of Literacy

Bongie, Chris

doi:10.5949/liverpool/9781781380314.003.0009

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…international relations perhaps allows us to stare more fixedly 41 Smith, 1992. 42 For a defence of global history's rise to prominence, see Drayton and Motadel, 2018. 43 Beckett, 2019;Bongie, 2016;Daut, 2015;Fischer, 2004;Gaffield, 2015;Popkin, 2010;Plummer, 2015. 44 Aydin, 2007;Bell, 2007Bell, , 2012Conrad and Sachsenmaier, 2012;Rosenboim, 2017. 45 Ikenberry, 2018;Hurrell, 2008;Clark, 2003. 46 Drolet and Williams, 2018. at the global as an ordering system of thought and political order, without being dragged down by the localizing impulses that remain, despite persistent efforts to the contrary, so powerful in sociology, history, political science, and anthropology.…”

Section: Musab Younismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Response section

Çapan,

Pardesi,

Younis

2023

Int. Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In his response, Manjeet S. Pardesi argues that global international relations and relational scholarship rooted in global history can learn much from each other and must work together to overcome Eurocentrism while avoiding other forms of ‘centrisms’. The second contribution by Zeynep Gülşah Çapan aims to underline three interrelated dynamics: space (global), time (history), and knowledge. In the third and final response, Musab Younis draws on Edward Said's critique of ‘counter-conversion’ to suggest how anticolonial and postcolonial thinkers sought to create oppositional forms of knowledge while remaining alert, in ways not always replicated in recent writing, to the dangers of nativism.

show abstract