2003
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.2003.10162460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memorable Messages as Discursive Formations: The Gendered Socialization of New University Faculty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the data, 346 messages from parents were identified. The messages were then sorted into a typology of message paths, guided in part by extant message classification systems (e.g., Bradford et al, 2001;Dallimore, 2003;Vangelisti, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the data, 346 messages from parents were identified. The messages were then sorted into a typology of message paths, guided in part by extant message classification systems (e.g., Bradford et al, 2001;Dallimore, 2003;Vangelisti, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent study that looked at implicit and explicit messages is Dallimore's (2003) examination of the influence of socializing communication on new faculty members. She uses a memorable messages framework, which includes two unique message paths: ''discrete'' (explicit, direct) and ''ambient'' (implicit, indirect) messages.…”
Section: Paths Of Socializing Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These messages aid receivers in processes of meaning-making by guiding them in making sense out of contexts, understanding situations, and selecting appropriate courses of action. Memorable messages have been examined in several contexts, including organizational socialization (Barge & Schlueter, 2004;Stohl, 1986), higher education (Dallimore, 2003), aging (Holladay, 2002), athletic performance (Kassing & Pappas, 2007), final conversations (Keeley, 2004), breast cancer prevention and detection (Smith et al, 2009), and work-family balance (Medved, Brogan, McClanahan, Morris, & Shepherd, 2006). 626 N. Miczo et al Early research by Knapp and associates (Knapp et al, 1981;Stohl, 1986) delineated five characteristics of memorable messages that have been unevenly supported by subsequent research.…”
Section: Memorable Messages and The H1n1 Flumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the last two and a half decades, communication scholars have studied memorable messages in terms of organizational socialization (e.g., Dallimore, 2003;Stohl, 1986), influence of family communication (e.g., Ellis & Smith, 2004;Medved, Brogan, McClanahan, Morris, & Shepherd, 2006), perceptions of illness and healthcare (e.g., Keely, 2004;Lauckner et al, 2012;Smith, Atkin, Skubisz, Nazion, & Stohl, 2009;Smith et al, 2010), constructions of identity (Heisler & Ellis, 2008;Holladay, 2002), and understandings of discrimination in an increasingly diverse world (Camara & Orbe, 2010). For this particular study, the literature on memorable messages represents a useful conceptual lens through which to study salient influences of current sexual practices (Medved et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Narratology Of Memorable Messages About Relationships Anmentioning
confidence: 99%