Chemical Engineering 2002
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-049064-9.50019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane Separation Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield with DCM increased by 1.1% from 25 °C to 30 °C followed by an inconsistent decrease of 0.1-0.3% to 45 °C. Increasing temperature enhances both the diffusion coefficient and solubility of extracts to the solvent and, hence, improves extraction rate (Richardson et al, 2002). However, for DCM the increase in temperature gave slightly lower yields due to high solvent volatility, reducing the solvent turnover rate.…”
Section: Effect Of Extraction Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The yield with DCM increased by 1.1% from 25 °C to 30 °C followed by an inconsistent decrease of 0.1-0.3% to 45 °C. Increasing temperature enhances both the diffusion coefficient and solubility of extracts to the solvent and, hence, improves extraction rate (Richardson et al, 2002). However, for DCM the increase in temperature gave slightly lower yields due to high solvent volatility, reducing the solvent turnover rate.…”
Section: Effect Of Extraction Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improves interaction between the sample and solvent implying a larger extraction rate and, hence, higher yields. However, when the sample particle is too small agglomeration may occur, which reduces the effective surface area available for diffusion of the solvent in the solid sample (Richardson et al, 2002;Tzia & Liadakis, 2003). The principle holds for a particle size of 0.4mm that yielded less than 2% of the total yield compared to particles with 1mm size.…”
Section: Effects Of Particle Size Of a Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bed of silk fibers with different porosities is shown in Table 2.2: Experimental values for K'' for silk fiber packed columns of different porosities (Lord 1951 This entire derivation is based on the assumption that the fluid flow in the porous structure is entirely laminar. A modified Reynold's number for flow in porous media (Richardson 2002) provides this confirmation in the following experiments. This modification multiplies the characteristic length, the average velocity, and fluid density (ρ) and divides by viscosity to get…”
Section: 3is Then Rewritten Asmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In this packed-sphere case, the porosity is 0.4, K'' is 5, and the specific surface area is 6x10 4 (1/m) (Richardson 2002 Recall that the silk porous structure has a porosity of 0.9 and a specific surface area of 7x10 5 (1/m). The silk structure has more than double the porosity, one-order of magnitude greater surface area, and it only costs a one-order of magnitude increase in pressure loss.…”
Section: Tortuositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process active carbon is the solid [1]. Adsorption is a process that occurs when a gas or liquid solute accumulates on the surface of a solid which is called as adsorbent or the material doing adsorbing, forming a molecular or atomic film which is called as the adsorbate or material that being adsorbed [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%