2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201502109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane proteins, magic-angle spinning, and in-cell NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with in-cell NMR 4,5 , in-cell EPR has two major advantages: low concentrations of spin labels can be used because EPR sensitivity per spin is much higher than that of NMR, and diamagnetic molecules in the vicinity of the spin label will not reduce the detection sensitivity of the signal, as EPR detects only unpaired electron spins. The latter advantage is particularly notable as, in contrast to structural studies conducted on isolated macromolecules, in in-cell experiments the macromolecules under investigation are often found in close proximity to many different cellular components, which could otherwise be associated with high background signal and decreased detection sensitivity of the desired signals.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with in-cell NMR 4,5 , in-cell EPR has two major advantages: low concentrations of spin labels can be used because EPR sensitivity per spin is much higher than that of NMR, and diamagnetic molecules in the vicinity of the spin label will not reduce the detection sensitivity of the signal, as EPR detects only unpaired electron spins. The latter advantage is particularly notable as, in contrast to structural studies conducted on isolated macromolecules, in in-cell experiments the macromolecules under investigation are often found in close proximity to many different cellular components, which could otherwise be associated with high background signal and decreased detection sensitivity of the desired signals.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the cells used in in-cell NMR are alive, intact and contain complete cellular compartments, the obtained information is therefore very useful in biology, as well as other fields, such as drug discovery. Although structural studies of membrane proteins in living cells are of great interest for in-cell NMR, this review will mainly focus on in-cell NMR studies of water-soluble proteins carried out using solution-state NMR [61,65].…”
Section: In-cell Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the positive side, bacterial in-cell NMR samples are prepared quickly (90), and, provided that isotope-labeled proteins tumble freely in the cytoplasm and do not overly interact with cellular components such as membranes, in-cell NMR detection by solution-state methods is straightforward. Whenever target proteins are inserted into membranes, solid-state in-or on-cell NMR approaches are more suitable and are usually chosen (74). On the negative side, recombinant protein production is difficult to control, and absolute intracellular protein concentrations are hard to quantify and reproduce precisely.…”
Section: In-cell Nmr In Prokaryotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, however, researchers wish to study large macromolecular assemblies or membrane proteins, which necessitate different approaches. High-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) solid-state NMR methods on cellular samples have been successfully employed to this end (74,78). Introduced in 2001 to characterize the abundant osmoregulated periplasmic glucans in Ralstonia solanacearum (103), HR-MAS methods have since been used to study protein structures in bacterial inclusion bodies (24,102), intracellular protein assemblies (77), membrane proteins in isolated membranes (32,46,48,58,79,80), and whole cells (47,80,99,105).…”
Section: Solid-state In-cell Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%