2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane processes for carbon capture from coal-fired power plant flue gas: A modeling and cost study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both CO2 permeation and ideal selectivity of LTA5 and Rho-filled MMM were enhanced in mixed gas separation in comparison with single gas permeation experiments, whereas this was not observed when CHA was used as filler. The real separation factor was calculated using equation (8). The separation factor has lower values than the ideal selectivity, because the zeolites and MMM adsorb preferentially the CO2 thus hindering the largest N2 molecule diffusion through the membrane.…”
Section: Mixed Gas Separation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both CO2 permeation and ideal selectivity of LTA5 and Rho-filled MMM were enhanced in mixed gas separation in comparison with single gas permeation experiments, whereas this was not observed when CHA was used as filler. The real separation factor was calculated using equation (8). The separation factor has lower values than the ideal selectivity, because the zeolites and MMM adsorb preferentially the CO2 thus hindering the largest N2 molecule diffusion through the membrane.…”
Section: Mixed Gas Separation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric membranes appear, currently, to be the most advanced option for membrane-based post-combustion carbon capture in terms of CO2/N2 permselectivity [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showed that for all cases higher CO 2 permeance led to lower required membrane area and higher CO 2 /N 2 selectivity resulted in lower energy requirements for the separation. Ramasubramanian et al (2012) reported the effect of operating conditions and membrane price to the overall cost for separating CO 2 from post-combustion flue gases. A membrane with a CO 2 permeance of 9.9x10 -7 mol m -2 s -1 Pa -1 and a CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of 140 operating at close to atmospheric pressure and using an air-sweep process can achieve a CO 2 recovery of 90 % and a purity of 95 % at a cost <$24t -1 CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most suitable membrane for single stage separation process would have about 8 m 3 (STP)/(m 2 h bar) permeance, a selectivity CO 2 /N 2 in the range of 140 and a price of 20 Euro/m 2 in module. [13] The required membrane surface is strongly dependent on membrane permeance but according to calculations using parameters of existing membranes it will be about one million square meters for a 600 MW power plant. Low feed pressure requires a vacuum scheme of membrane use and thus process selectivity and energy demand will depend on the vacuum created on permeate side of the membrane and pressure losses inside the membrane module.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%