1956
DOI: 10.2307/1539191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane Potential and Resistance of the Starfish Egg Before and After Fertilization

Abstract: Unequal distribution of ions between the interior and exterior is characteristic of living cells. In many thus far studied the concentration of potassium is much higher in the interior while the concentrations of sodium and chloride are lower. This ionic asymmetry is associated with a potential difference across the plasma membrane which is approximately related to the relative concentration of potassium (Hober, 1945; Hodgkin, 1951) according to the Nernst equation:or at 20 C., E (in mv.) = -58 log (A + )o Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
33
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On further insertion, the potential abruptly deflected to the negative side, attaining -40 mV, then levelled at about -20 mV, indicating the membrane potential of the unactivated egg (Fig.lA, C, r). A similar large negative potential change, followed by a decrease in membrane potential caused by electrical leakage at the penetration site of the ooplasmic membrane, has already been reported in echinoderm eggs ( TYLER et al, 1956) and was observed frequently in the present experiments in the various experimental media. Upon insemination, the membrane potential, overshooting zero potential, rose rapidly to its crest, as high as 32 mV positive, and then declined gradually, usually taking 1-2 minutes to reach a steady state, which was nearly zero (Fig.lA).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On further insertion, the potential abruptly deflected to the negative side, attaining -40 mV, then levelled at about -20 mV, indicating the membrane potential of the unactivated egg (Fig.lA, C, r). A similar large negative potential change, followed by a decrease in membrane potential caused by electrical leakage at the penetration site of the ooplasmic membrane, has already been reported in echinoderm eggs ( TYLER et al, 1956) and was observed frequently in the present experiments in the various experimental media. Upon insemination, the membrane potential, overshooting zero potential, rose rapidly to its crest, as high as 32 mV positive, and then declined gradually, usually taking 1-2 minutes to reach a steady state, which was nearly zero (Fig.lA).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the spread of depolarization over the egg surface upon fertilization is still unproven (ROTHSCHILD, 1956), many investigators have confirmed the existence of a slow monophasic potential change* during fertilization, by intracellular recording (in echinoderm eggs by TYLER, MONROY, KAO and GRUNDFEST, 1956; * A slow monophasic potential change during activation was referred to as the "activation potential" (MAENO, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 a, it was -9 mV. Similarly the relatively low values of 0 to -60 mV in the resting potentials have been reported in the marine echinoderm eggs (Rothschild, 1938;Kamada & Kinosita, 1940;Scheer, Santagelo & Riccobono, 1954;Lundberg, 1955;Tyler, Monroy, Kao & Grundfest, 1956;Hiramoto, 1959a, b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…1 ; cf. Tyler, Monroy, Kao, and Grundfest, 1956) on the stage of a binocular dissecting microscope . All manipulations were carried out at a magnification of 50 X .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%