The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane fouling control using a rotary disk in a submerged anaerobic membrane sponge bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) has been studied to treat wastewater and has several advantages including complete rejection of suspended solids, low sludge production, high organic rejection and biogas production (Stuckey, 2012). Moreover, both AnMBR and post-treatment (e.g., RO and NF) exhibit high fouling issues which ultimately increase energy requirements since these processes are driven by the hydraulic pressure as a driving force (Kim et al, 2014). To overcome these issues, osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) has been proposed by integrating AnMBR with forward osmosis (FO) instead of conventional pressurized membrane processes (Achilli et al, 2009;Chekli et al, 2016;Wang et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) has been studied to treat wastewater and has several advantages including complete rejection of suspended solids, low sludge production, high organic rejection and biogas production (Stuckey, 2012). Moreover, both AnMBR and post-treatment (e.g., RO and NF) exhibit high fouling issues which ultimately increase energy requirements since these processes are driven by the hydraulic pressure as a driving force (Kim et al, 2014). To overcome these issues, osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) has been proposed by integrating AnMBR with forward osmosis (FO) instead of conventional pressurized membrane processes (Achilli et al, 2009;Chekli et al, 2016;Wang et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible development pathways include the use of physical media for scouring of the membrane surface 34,35,49 or membrane vibration. 18,50,51 Including GAC in an AnMBR has many benefits (e.g., decreased membrane fouling, 35,52,53 higher fluxes, 52 and removal of trace contaminants), 35 but its use needs to be further evaluated through longterm experimental studies to better quantify trade-offs between an increased flux and a potential decrease in membrane life (increasing maintenance costs). To the degree possible, research efforts should focus on physical medium selection and membrane geometry to achieve membrane cleaning without damage, and simultaneously target cheaper, smaller, and lower density particles 49 to reduce upflow velocity requirements for bed expansion (e.g., reduce upflow velocity to <7.5 m·hr −1 while keeping HRT below 1.6 hrs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the pervaporation technique, the fouling is the most challenging problem hindering the wide application of this method. However, some innovative solutions as rotary membrane module and preparation of new antifouling membranes and reduction of membrane fouling by injection of the air jet are under development to overcome these issues [90,91]. The integration of fully unconventional techniques in bioethanol as an alternative to distillation seems too far but hybrid systems combining distillation with unconventional techniques have currently received more attention.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%