2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane efficiency and diffusive tortuosity of a dense prehydrated geosynthetic clay liner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shackelford et al / Geotextiles and Geomembranes xxx (2016) 1e12 As indicated in Table 3, the values of u o and u ave decrease with increasing values of C ot , which is consistent with the results of previous studies (e.g., Malusis and Shackelford, 2002b;Shackelford, 2009, 2011;Malusis and Daniyarov, 2016). This behavior has been explained in terms of classical DDL theory, whereby an increase in C ot results in an increase in the salt concentration in the pore water of the bentonite which, in turn, results in compression of the DDLs surrounding the individual clay particles, an increase in the sizes of the pores, and a decrease in solute restriction (Fritz, 1986).…”
Section: Membrane Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Shackelford et al / Geotextiles and Geomembranes xxx (2016) 1e12 As indicated in Table 3, the values of u o and u ave decrease with increasing values of C ot , which is consistent with the results of previous studies (e.g., Malusis and Shackelford, 2002b;Shackelford, 2009, 2011;Malusis and Daniyarov, 2016). This behavior has been explained in terms of classical DDL theory, whereby an increase in C ot results in an increase in the salt concentration in the pore water of the bentonite which, in turn, results in compression of the DDLs surrounding the individual clay particles, an increase in the sizes of the pores, and a decrease in solute restriction (Fritz, 1986).…”
Section: Membrane Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, unlike Meier et al (2014), two different values of u are distinguished in Table 3, i.e., values of u designated as u o that were calculated using the source concentrations (i.e., C ot and C ob ), and values of u designated as u ave that were calculated using the averages of the top and bottom boundary concentrations defined as follows (Malusis et al, 2001;Malusis and Shackelford, 2002b;Shackelford, 2013a, b;Malusis and Daniyarov, 2016):…”
Section: Membrane Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations