2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00424-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane bioreactor for the drinking water treatment of polluted surface water supplies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
54
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mansell et al [121] reported achievement of five-log virus inactivation with free chlorine dosing to MBR effluent at concentrations one-tenth of 450 mg Cl2-min/L, which is the minimum value required by California Water Recycling Criteria (Title 22) for all chlorine disinfection processes. Li et al [122] found that after treatment by MBR with a short HRT of less than an hour, the required dose of chlorine for the effluent to reach the drinking water standard was reduced from 22.3 ± 5.1 to 0.5 ± 0.1 mg/L. Hirani et al [17] reported that despite the passage of microbes in higher concentrations through a breached membrane (filtrate turbidity of 1.0 NTU) of an MBR, a free chlorine dose of 30 mg-min/L was sufficient to achieve greater than five-log removal of seeded MS2 bacteriophage and removal of total coliform bacteria at or below the detection limit.…”
Section: Requirement Of Post-disinfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mansell et al [121] reported achievement of five-log virus inactivation with free chlorine dosing to MBR effluent at concentrations one-tenth of 450 mg Cl2-min/L, which is the minimum value required by California Water Recycling Criteria (Title 22) for all chlorine disinfection processes. Li et al [122] found that after treatment by MBR with a short HRT of less than an hour, the required dose of chlorine for the effluent to reach the drinking water standard was reduced from 22.3 ± 5.1 to 0.5 ± 0.1 mg/L. Hirani et al [17] reported that despite the passage of microbes in higher concentrations through a breached membrane (filtrate turbidity of 1.0 NTU) of an MBR, a free chlorine dose of 30 mg-min/L was sufficient to achieve greater than five-log removal of seeded MS2 bacteriophage and removal of total coliform bacteria at or below the detection limit.…”
Section: Requirement Of Post-disinfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological removal of nitrate can be affected by various factors: different types of external C sources [6,7], various types of micro-organisms [6,8], various operational parameters such as C/N ratios [2,9,10], temperature [3,[11][12][13], pH [3,11], dissolved oxygen [12,14,15], hydraulic retention time [16][17][18], nitrate and nitrite concentratios [11,19] and mixed liquor suspended solids [10,20]. In addition, nitrate removal highly depends on the substrate amount that influences the denitrification rate, denitrification yield, and the composition of the microflora [6,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate removal from contaminated groundwater, drinking water, and surface water has been examined by using extractive MBRs [26], ion-exchange and gas-transfer MBRs [20], pressure-driven MBRs [10,16,20] and other known hybrid systems. The Zenon ZW 10 membrane bioreactor was used in the denitrification of drinking water sources by Buttiglieri et al [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1932-1058/2014/8(1)/014105/12/$30.00 V C 2014 AIP Publishing LLC 8, 014105-1 be maximized (Lebleu et al, 2009), while the formation of biofilm on the membrane surface has to be avoided (Li and Chu, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%