Membrane Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-85617-632-3.00006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane Applications in Monoclonal Antibody Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precipitate was retained by a microfilter, allowing for a wash in DF mode. In CFF, turbulent flow along the membrane surface ensures better recovery from the filter (Davies and Smith, 2010), also reducing concentration polarization and fouling (van Reis and Zydney, 2007). A main advantage of precipitate recovery by CFF over centrifugation lies in avoiding the compaction of precipitate that occurs during centrifugation, which allows for shorter precipitate re-dissolution times using CFF (Hammerschmidt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitate was retained by a microfilter, allowing for a wash in DF mode. In CFF, turbulent flow along the membrane surface ensures better recovery from the filter (Davies and Smith, 2010), also reducing concentration polarization and fouling (van Reis and Zydney, 2007). A main advantage of precipitate recovery by CFF over centrifugation lies in avoiding the compaction of precipitate that occurs during centrifugation, which allows for shorter precipitate re-dissolution times using CFF (Hammerschmidt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%