2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membership set identification with periodic inputs and orthonormal regressors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let N be the number of input u(k) and output y(k) measurements available from the process. From the state-space representation of the orthonormal basis, the vector l(k) in (19) can be calculated for k = 1, …, N. Then, using a set of available I/O measurements and considering an exact representation of the polytope generated by S, one obtains the following: Based on the definition of the set S in (26), the bounds of the uncertain parameters c(ε) can be calculated using different robust identification algorithms found in the literature (Milanese and Belforte, 1982;Mo and Norton, 1990;da Silva, 1995;Akçay and At, 2006). The computation of the polytope generated by S can become complicated as the number N of measurements increases.…”
Section: Robust Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let N be the number of input u(k) and output y(k) measurements available from the process. From the state-space representation of the orthonormal basis, the vector l(k) in (19) can be calculated for k = 1, …, N. Then, using a set of available I/O measurements and considering an exact representation of the polytope generated by S, one obtains the following: Based on the definition of the set S in (26), the bounds of the uncertain parameters c(ε) can be calculated using different robust identification algorithms found in the literature (Milanese and Belforte, 1982;Mo and Norton, 1990;da Silva, 1995;Akçay and At, 2006). The computation of the polytope generated by S can become complicated as the number N of measurements increases.…”
Section: Robust Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%