Members of the Scottish Parliament on Twitter: good constituency men (and women)?

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of Twitter by Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) for the provision of constituency-related information, or in support of their constituency service work. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis of 10,411 tweets sent by the 105 MSPs on Twitter during four weeks in early-2014. Findings – While there was some evidence of MSPs on Twitter acting as a promoter of local community interests and as a conduit for information on local policy issues and events, their tweets were dominated by the wider, national, political agenda and by the Scottish independence debate. Compared with their online behaviour as parliamentary candidates three years earlier, MSPs placed an even greater emphasis on the one-way broadcast of information to their followers. They were reluctant to respond to contentious local policy questions, or to enter into any visible, meaningful, political debate with their constituents. Research limitations/implications – Although the research was conducted seven months before the Scottish independence referendum on 18 September 2014, the independence debate still dominated proceedings on Twitter. It might, therefore, be appropriate to revisit MSPs’ use of Twitter at some point during a truer “peacetime” period. Originality/value – This is the first systematic content analysis of tweets sent by all MSPs on Twitter. It allows the authors to compare their actual Twitter use with that envisaged by the Scottish Parliament, as a way of MSPs communicating about their work and engaging with their constituents.

What is the problem? Representations of gender and violence towards politicians in UK parliamentary debates

“…The explanation for the phenomenon of violence towards politicians becoming politicised is likely multifaceted. The rise in social media use seems to have caused an increase of abuse through the nature of the platform (which allows anonymity and abusive content to spread easily), its lack of regulation and the ongoing expectation of MPs' presence on the platforms (Baxter et al, 2016;Ward and McLoughlin, 2020). Furthermore, discrete events are likely explanatory.…”

Reaching, Engaging and Bonding with Voters on Social Media: The Case of 2014/2015 Croatian Presidential Elections

“…Twitter's 140-character restriction). However, perhaps a more likely explanation is that political actors continue to see social media as a low-cost public relations vehicle that serves as an alternative to expensive forms of campaign communication and promotion (Baxter et al, 2016;Obholzer and Daniel, 2016). This is in line with Stromer-Galley's recent argument that "campaigns wish to mobilise the public in the service of the campaign, but getting too close to them, really listening and empowering them, is dangerous or at least disadvantageous" (Stromer-Galley, 2014: 187).…”

A dual lens approach to exploring informal communication's influence on learning in a political party

“…It plays a vital role in situated learning, being based on "shared understanding and language, trust, occupational membership as well as situational opportunity and privacy" (Waring and Bishop, 2010). Information seeking behaviour by parliamentarians does feature in the research literature (Baxter et al, 2016;Galtrud and Bystr€ om, 2020;Marcella, et al, 1999;Marcella et al, 2007;Mostert and Ocholla, 2005;Orton et al, 2000;Walgrave and Dejaeghere, 2017) and often included reference to the need for more studies in this arena. Further research has been conducted by Baxter and Marcella (2017) into voter online behaviour during the Scottish referendum.…”