2005
DOI: 10.1007/11547273_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MemBeR: A Micro-benchmark Repository for XQuery

Abstract: XQuery is a feature-rich language with complex semantics. This makes it hard to come up with a benchmark suite which covers all performance-critical features of the language, and at the same time allows one to individually validate XQuery evaluation techniques. This paper presents MemBeR, a micro-benchmark repository, allowing the evaluation of an XQuery implementation with respect to precise evaluation techniques. We take the view that a fixed set of queries is probably insufficient to allow testing for vario… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the number of documents selected. Our benchmark queries focus on the navigational features of XPath, following the approach of the MemBeR XQuery Micro-Benchmark [2] (which provide some form of standardization for studying different aspects of XML data management systems). Comparative times for Wiki45 are not reported because neither XHive/DB nor XQuest DB could load the entire collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the number of documents selected. Our benchmark queries focus on the navigational features of XPath, following the approach of the MemBeR XQuery Micro-Benchmark [2] (which provide some form of standardization for studying different aspects of XML data management systems). Comparative times for Wiki45 are not reported because neither XHive/DB nor XQuest DB could load the entire collection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), (2) total time needed to execute all the queries in micro benchmarks 5 (fig. 3), and (3) query execution time of all the queries on the largest collection (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of the latter, consider the question whether the performance of males and females differs in parliament, and how that has changed over the years. To enable more comprehensive analysis of the RDF stores' performances, we grouped the benchmark queries into four micro benchmarks [5] with respect to the their analytical aims Average, Count, Factual and Top 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But all the elements of these benchmarks including data and workload are based on RDBMS, which is unavailable for XML databases. As XML data is widely used, many benchmarks for XML databases have been proposed, such as: XMark [1], XOO7 [2], XBench [3], XMach-1 [4], TPoX [5], XPathMark [6], MBench [7], MemBeR [8]. They assess XML databases in various aspects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%