2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2628-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, differentially influences Go/No-Go performance and fMRI activity in individuals with and without a family history of alcoholism

Abstract: Rationale Individuals with a family history of alcoholism (family history positive [FHP]) show higher alcoholism rates and are more impulsive than those without such a family history (family history negative [FHN]), possibly due to altered N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function. Objectives We investigated whether memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, differentially influences impulsivity measures and Go/No-Go behavior and fMRI activity in matched FHP and FHN individuals. Methods On separate days, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following 10 out-of-scanner practice trials, participants completed two runs of an fMRI Go/No-Go task (Jamadar et al, 2012;Stevens et al, 2007). Runs each consisted of 246 trials, lasted 7 min 21 s and were separated by an approximately 1-min break.…”
Section: Fmri Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following 10 out-of-scanner practice trials, participants completed two runs of an fMRI Go/No-Go task (Jamadar et al, 2012;Stevens et al, 2007). Runs each consisted of 246 trials, lasted 7 min 21 s and were separated by an approximately 1-min break.…”
Section: Fmri Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common paradigm used in FH functional imaging studies has been the go/no-go task (Jamadar et al, 2012, Heitzeg et al, 2010, DeVito et al, 2013, Schweinsburg et al, 2004). Go/no-go tasks activate forebrain circuitry that regulates selective attention and inhibitory control by requiring subjects to selectively respond only to appropriate stimuli (“go” cues) and withhold responding to inappropriate stimuli (“no-go” cues) (Eagle et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to examining differences in task-activated patterns between alcoholics and controls, fMRI paradigms have been useful in detecting group differences related to preexisting conditions in and predisposing genetic factors to alcoholism occurring in alcoholism (e.g., Cardenas et al, 2005;Claus, Ewing, Filbey, Sabbineni, & Hutchison, 2011;Cservenka & Nagel, 2012;Hill, Terwilliger, & McDermott, 2012;Jamadar et al, 2012;Kareken et al, 2010;Norman et al, 2013;Schuckit et al, 2011;Silveri, Rogowska, McCaffrey, & Yurgelun-Todd, 2011;Villafuerte et al, 2012;Weiland et al, 2013;Wetherill et al, 2012). Regarding responsivity to alcohol cues (Schacht, Anton, & Myrick, 2013;Squeglia, Jacobus, & Tapert, 2014), one fMRI study used a passive viewing paradigm of positive, negative, or neutral words to examine high (vulnerable)-and low (resilient)-drinking late adolescents of alcoholic parents (Heitzeg, Nigg, Yau, Zubieta, & Zucker, 2008).…”
Section: Frontostriatal Circuitrymentioning
confidence: 99%