Melville and Aesthetics
DOI: 10.1057/9780230120044.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melville’s Ornamentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2.25), with M 4 ∼ Λ 3 3 M P ), we instead imagine that heavy fields have been integrated out directly at the scale M, where the only symmetry is an approximate shift symmetry for φ. In an upcoming work [64], we demonstrate that this choice is also consistent with the physics in the Jordanframe: a field redefinition of a purely disformal coupling in the Einstein-frame (which lives at M) into the Jordan-frame results in a special Horndeski theory (which enjoys a cancellation of every operator below M) that does not exhibit conventional Vainshtein screening at R V .…”
Section: Jcap09(2020)013supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2.25), with M 4 ∼ Λ 3 3 M P ), we instead imagine that heavy fields have been integrated out directly at the scale M, where the only symmetry is an approximate shift symmetry for φ. In an upcoming work [64], we demonstrate that this choice is also consistent with the physics in the Jordanframe: a field redefinition of a purely disformal coupling in the Einstein-frame (which lives at M) into the Jordan-frame results in a special Horndeski theory (which enjoys a cancellation of every operator below M) that does not exhibit conventional Vainshtein screening at R V .…”
Section: Jcap09(2020)013supporting
confidence: 57%
“…For instance, it does not seem to occur for single bodies, is absent if both particles are at rest, and is controlled by the geometric mean √ m 1 m 2 of the masses. We will show explicitly in an upcoming work [64] that an explicit field redefinition of the simple model (1.2) to the Jordan-frame results in a particular Horndeski theory (namely the quartic DBI Galileon [65,66]) in which the gravitational mixing exactly cancels the Galileon-type operators which are usually responsible for Vainshtein. Consequently, this ladder screening appears to be independent of the Vainshtein mechanism.…”
Section: Jcap09(2020)013mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(2.24), with M 4 " Λ 3 3 M P ), we instead imagine that heavy fields have been integrated out directly at the scale M, where the only symmetry is an approximate shift symmetry for φ. In an upcoming work [64], we demonstrate that this choice is also consistent with the physics in the Jordan-frame: a field redefinition of a purely disformal coupling in the Einstein-frame (which lives at M) into the Jordan-frame results in a special Horndeski theory (which enjoys a cancellation of every operator below M) that does not exhibit conventional Vainshtein screening at R V .…”
Section: Validity Of the Ladder Expansionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…m 1 m 2 of the masses. We will show explicitly in an upcoming work [64] that an explicit field redefinition of the simple model (1.2) to the Jordan-frame results in a particular Horndeski theory (namely the quartic DBI Galileon [65,66]) in which the gravitational mixing exactly cancels the Galileon-type operators which are usually responsible for Vainshtein. Consequently, this ladder screening appears to be independent of the Vainshtein mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…En términos de estas características, las vocales \a\, \i\ y \u\ representan los movimientos articulatorios extremos, por lo que reciben el nombre de "vocales de las esquinas del triángulo vocal", estudiadas en [31], [32], [33]. En cuanto al dominio cepstral en el análisis de las vocales sostenidas, se calcularon los coeficientes cepstrales de frecuencia de Mel (MFCC, por sus siglas en inglés), que se pueden entender como la representación del habla que se basa en la percepción auditiva humana [34].…”
Section: Extracción De Característicasunclassified