2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpr.2023.100101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MeltR software provides facile determination of nucleic acid thermodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Melting points of double stranded RNA 7mers (Figure 4, analogue to [38] ) with native uridine and m1Ψ containing oligos were determined at concentrations between 0.9 and 12 μM (single stranded oligo concentration, Figures S17 and S18). The program MeltR [39] was used to calculate the slope of 1/T m versus ln(C t ) versus and then to derive the thermodynamic parameters of RNA dimer formation (Table 2, Figures S19 and S20). It can be seen that the melting energies of the studied sequence are slightly more favourable for the m1Ψ modified oligomer compared with the native oligomer with uridine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Melting points of double stranded RNA 7mers (Figure 4, analogue to [38] ) with native uridine and m1Ψ containing oligos were determined at concentrations between 0.9 and 12 μM (single stranded oligo concentration, Figures S17 and S18). The program MeltR [39] was used to calculate the slope of 1/T m versus ln(C t ) versus and then to derive the thermodynamic parameters of RNA dimer formation (Table 2, Figures S19 and S20). It can be seen that the melting energies of the studied sequence are slightly more favourable for the m1Ψ modified oligomer compared with the native oligomer with uridine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[a] calculated with MeltR, [39] using its method 2 (1/T m versus ln[C t ]), [b] calculated with nearest neighbour parameters from Xia et al; [41] [c] calculated with nearest neighbour parameters from Mauger et al; [21] [d] calculated with nearest neighbour parameters from Hudson et al [38]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that other recent work is available for improved fitting of optical melting data. 58 P−Z and G−Z Stacking Free Energy Change Nearest Neighbor Fits. A custom Python program was written to fit the P−Z nearest neighbor parameters.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of the output from our Matlab routines is provided as Figure S1 and the code is available at GitHub at . We note that other recent work is available for improved fitting of optical melting data …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the following definitions: Since the concentration of O1 and O2 are equal by preparation, we can substitute [O2] and [O1:O2] in the first equation to obtain a quadratic equation in terms of [O1]: The temperature dependence of hybridization can then be captured within the temperature dependence of K as follows: With R being the gas constant (1.987 x 10 −3 kcal/mol/K) and assuming that ΔH and ΔS are temperature independent in the range of interest, so that the unbound fraction of O1 ( f = [O1]/[O1] tot ) in a melting experiment is simply: The fluorescent signal coming from our melting oligonucleotides is an average of the signals coming from single stranded O1 oligonucleotides and double stranded O1 oligonucleotides, weighted for their respective emissions, whose temperature dependent behavior can be assumed as being linear for simplicity 30 . To fit our data, instead of manually subtracting baselines from our traces to convert them into fractions, we opted to automatically incorporate them in our fitting routine 31 for better reproducibility, so that the raw fluorescent signals (F) were fitted as: Where F ss (T) = m ss + q ss is the signal coming from single stranded O1 and F ds (T) = m ds + q ds is the signal coming from double stranded O1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%