2000
DOI: 10.1080/13642810008218339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting of the light actinides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then Eq. 5 has the melting point on both sides, but can nevertheless be solved explicitly, as shown by Lawson et al (2000aLawson et al ( , 2000c. The large (negative) value of c shown in Fig 14 gives a calculated value of the melting point that is in good agreement with the observed low melting point.…”
Section: Pu Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then Eq. 5 has the melting point on both sides, but can nevertheless be solved explicitly, as shown by Lawson et al (2000aLawson et al ( , 2000c. The large (negative) value of c shown in Fig 14 gives a calculated value of the melting point that is in good agreement with the observed low melting point.…”
Section: Pu Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…% Ga (Lawson et al, 2000) 10 100 1000 Pu-2 at. % Ga (Lawson et al, 2000a) Pb (Lisher, 1976) The difference between anharmonic and harmonic softening is illustrated in Fig. 15, which shows plots of normalized Debye temperature, Θ/Θ 0 , versus the normalized lattice constant, a/a 295K for Pb and for Pu-2 at.…”
Section: Pu Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations