2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41535-020-0217-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting of charge order in the low-temperature state of an electronic ferroelectric-like system

Abstract: Strong electronic interactions can drive a system into a state with a symmetry breaking. Lattice frustration or competing interactions tend to prevent a symmetry breaking, leading to quantum disordered phases. In spin systems frustration can produce a spin liquid state. Frustration of a charge degree of freedom also can result in various exotic states, however, experimental data on these effects is scarce. In this work we demonstrate how a charge ordered ferroelectric looses the order on cooling to low tempera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem might be due to melting of charge order at low temperatures. Results from a recent Raman scattering study suggest that the charge-ordered state formed at T CO = 30 K is not the ground state; rather it persists only down to T = 15 K and gradually melts below [287]. In Figure 41 the temperature evolution of the Raman spectra is plotted in the frequency range of the charge-sensitive ν 2 (a g ) stretching vibration that involves the central C=C bond of the BEDT-TTF molecules.…”
Section: Ferroelectricity Driven By Charge Order In Dimerized Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem might be due to melting of charge order at low temperatures. Results from a recent Raman scattering study suggest that the charge-ordered state formed at T CO = 30 K is not the ground state; rather it persists only down to T = 15 K and gradually melts below [287]. In Figure 41 the temperature evolution of the Raman spectra is plotted in the frequency range of the charge-sensitive ν 2 (a g ) stretching vibration that involves the central C=C bond of the BEDT-TTF molecules.…”
Section: Ferroelectricity Driven By Charge Order In Dimerized Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the metallic state at T = 45 K BEDT-TTF 0.5+ band is observed, while in the charged ordered state at 20 K two bands BEDT-TTF 0.4+ and BEDT-TTF 0.6+ are clearly resolved. On further cooling at T = 10 K and 4 K signatures of charge order melting are detected: the two bands BEDT-TTF 0.4+ and BEDT-TTF 0.6+ broaden and a BEDT-TTF 0.5+ band emerges (after [287]).…”
Section: Ferroelectricity Driven By Charge Order In Dimerized Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is perhaps very relevant in this context is that transition from CO to SC is far more common in CT solids, including in the β, β , β and θ-families [14]. Even among the κ-phase materials, CO has been detected in X = Hg(SCN) 2 Cl [47][48][49] while in the related material X = Hg(SCN) 2 Br there occurs a dipolar liquid phase [50] the formation of which is related to the mechanism of CO formation [51,52]. While these latter materials are also strongly correlated, CO requires an effective 1 4 -filled (or 3 4 -filled) description of CT solids, within which intra-dimer charge dimer degrees of freedom are explicitly taken into account [14,[53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is perhaps very relevant in this context that transition from CO to SC is far more common in CT solids, including in the β, β , β and θ-families [14]. Even among the κ-phase materials, CO has been detected in X = Hg(SCN) 2 Cl [45][46][47] while in the related material X = Hg(SCN) 2 Br there occurs a dipolar liquid phase [48] the formation of which is related to the mechanism of CO formation [49,50]. While these latter materials are also strongly correlated, CO requires an an effective 1 4 -filled (or 3 4 -filled description of CT solids, within which intra-dimer charge dimer degrees of freedom are explicitly taken into account [14,[51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%