2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting in a vertical cylindrical tube: Numerical investigation and comparison with experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different values of mushy zone constant ranged from 10 3 to 10 10 were reported in previous numerical studies [47][48][49]. In the present work, A mush is assigned to a value of 2.5 Â 10 6 which shows the best consistency with previous experimental works.…”
Section: Pcmsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Different values of mushy zone constant ranged from 10 3 to 10 10 were reported in previous numerical studies [47][48][49]. In the present work, A mush is assigned to a value of 2.5 Â 10 6 which shows the best consistency with previous experimental works.…”
Section: Pcmsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although there are some experimental results for vertical shell-and-tube heat exchangers [21][22][23], there are limited computational studies of vertical cylindrical tube systems [24][25] and vertical cylindrical shell-and-tube systems which are commonly used in the thermal energy storage. In this study, a numerical simulation was conducted to investigate the heat transfer mechanism inside a vertical cylindrical shell-and-tube latent heat energy storage system during different charging and discharging stages.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2D vertical slice of the cylinder is modeled to reduce computational time. Following previous numerical studies using Fluent [9,18,25], the transient simulation with the pressure staggering option (PRESTO) scheme is used for the pressure correction equation, and a Coupled algorithm was used for pressurevelocity coupling. A second order upwind scheme was used to solve the momentum and energy equations.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no universal value for A mush in modelling by Enthalpy-Porosity method, different values have been used in different systems [19,26]. As clearly shown in [27], melt fraction and solid shape evolution are highly dependent on A mush , and there exists an optimum value of A mush for each system. Thus, careful determination of correct A mush for our system is necessary.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%