2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1508.03260
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks

Johann Rafelski

Abstract: In the context of the Hagedorn temperature half-centenary I describe our understanding of the hot phases of hadronic matter both below and above the Hagedorn temperature. The first part of the review addresses many frequently posed questions about properties of hadronic matter in different phases, phase transition and the exploration of quark-gluon plasma (QGP). The historical context of the discovery of QGP is shown and the role of strangeness and strange antibaryon signature of QGP illustrated. In the second… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(233 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sound velocity, v 2 s = ∂P/∂E, is a fundamental quantity in the expansion of hot and dense matter [68].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound velocity, v 2 s = ∂P/∂E, is a fundamental quantity in the expansion of hot and dense matter [68].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We just briefly remind that in the GCE formulation of the HRG model the conserved charges, such as net baryon number B, electric charge Q, and strangeness S, are conserved on average, but can differ from one microscopic state to another. The fitting parameters in GCE HRG are the temperature T , baryon chemical potential µ B 1 , the system volume V , and the strangeness saturation parameter γ S [24][25][26].…”
Section: Hadron Resonance Gas Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the 1/σ EP corrections are relatively minor for v 2 , but depend very strongly on centrality, while they can be a factor of 5 or higher for v 3 . That means that the actual modulations v raw n measured in the experiments are sometimes quite small and often similar across centralities 75 . Using two or more EP detectors with different resolutions (and still getting consistent results) alleviates some of these concerns.…”
Section: B the Devil's Advocatementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The dispersion between the experimentally reconstructed Ψn and the true Φn of the underlying distribution[322] 75. Of course from a purely mathematical point of view the procedure is correct, but the critical reader of experimental papers should be aware that the final results are small measured numbers subject to large corrections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%