1992
DOI: 10.1002/9780470141410.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting and Liquid Structure in two Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
85
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
6
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, those experiments focused on testing 2D melting theories [3,4,41,42] rather than on searching for grain-boundary melting and interfacial melting.…”
Section: D Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, those experiments focused on testing 2D melting theories [3,4,41,42] rather than on searching for grain-boundary melting and interfacial melting.…”
Section: D Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the liquid to crystal transition in three-dimensional systems is usually a first order transition, the situation in twodimensional systems is found to be more complex. Grain-boundary induced melting [6][7][8] or condensation of geometrical defects [9,10] suggest a first order phase transition, while the theory of John M. Kosterlitz, David J. Thouless, Bertrand Halperin, David R. Nelson, and Allan P. Young [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], the so called KTHNY theory, predicted a melting process via two continuous phase transitions with an intermediate phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Besides empirical criteria, fundamental theories of freezing/melting in 2D have been formulated. KosterlitzThouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young ͑KTHNY͒ theory [13][14][15][16] and other 2D melting theories, [17][18][19] however, address singlecrystal melting. In principle, these melting theories can be applied to freezing, but in practice homogenous nucleation at finite quench rates most often produces polycrystalline solids upon freezing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%