2008
DOI: 10.2172/940390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melt Rate Furnace Testing for Sludge Batch 5 Frit Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this system is highlighted in this report, the same trends have been observed for subsequent sludge batches either through experimental studies at SRNL , Smith et al 2007, Miller et al 2008) and/or DWPF operations. The general trend of melt rate versus WL is conceptually shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Melt Rate As a Function Of Wlsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Although this system is highlighted in this report, the same trends have been observed for subsequent sludge batches either through experimental studies at SRNL , Smith et al 2007, Miller et al 2008) and/or DWPF operations. The general trend of melt rate versus WL is conceptually shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Melt Rate As a Function Of Wlsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Melt rate tests were performed as detailed in the melt rate run plan [12]. SRAT product, adjusted for REDOX, from Cluster 2 and Cluster 4 were used at a waste loading target of 36%.…”
Section: Mrf Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured melt rates for the frit standard were consistent with previous studies. IS1 2,10,18 0.8,0.8,0.9 0.8 IS2 3,11,19 0.8,0.8,0.9 0.8 IS3 4,12,20 0.8,0.8,0.7 0.8 IS4 5,13,21 0.7,0.7,0.8 0.7 IS5 6,14,22 0.8,0.8,0.9 0.9 IS6 7,15,23 0.7,0.8,0.7 0.7 IS7 8,16,24 0.5,0.7,0.6 0.6 418 1,9,17 0.5,0.5,0.6 0.5 Frit Standard A,B,C,D 1.6,1.6,1.5,1.6 1.6 The results in Table 3 …”
Section: Mrf Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%