2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03735.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes

Abstract: MELD-based allocation of deceased donor livers allows exceptions for patients whose score may not reflect their true mortality risk. We hypothesized that OPOs may differ in exception practices, use of exceptions may be increasing over time, and exception patients may be advantaged relative to other patients. We analyzed longitudinal MELD score, exception, and outcome in 88,981 adult liver candidates as reported to UNOS from2002–2010.Proportion of patients receiving an HCC exception was 0–21.4% at the OPO-level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
164
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Even with this policy, the odds of a patient with HCC receiving the organ remains substantially higher compared to non-HCC patient. 51,52 On the other hand, about 29% of patients with HCC are dropped from the waiting list due to tumor progression suggesting consideration of other factors such as number of tumors, alphafetoprotein levels, tumor biology, and biological or calculated MELD score for transplanting HCC patients. 49,53 However, many of these factors are also associated with tumor recurrence after transplantation and a higher probability of drop out risk from the waiting list is directly correlated with a higher risk of recurrence of HCC after transplantation.…”
Section: Model For End-stage Liver Disease Exception Points and Livermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Even with this policy, the odds of a patient with HCC receiving the organ remains substantially higher compared to non-HCC patient. 51,52 On the other hand, about 29% of patients with HCC are dropped from the waiting list due to tumor progression suggesting consideration of other factors such as number of tumors, alphafetoprotein levels, tumor biology, and biological or calculated MELD score for transplanting HCC patients. 49,53 However, many of these factors are also associated with tumor recurrence after transplantation and a higher probability of drop out risk from the waiting list is directly correlated with a higher risk of recurrence of HCC after transplantation.…”
Section: Model For End-stage Liver Disease Exception Points and Livermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of this view contend that post-LT treatment of HCV would alleviate this concern. We should be cognizant of the fact that up to 3000 potential liver transplant candidates are removed from the waitlist annually in the United Stateshalf develop contraindications for LT while the wait for a potential donor and the other half die from complications of end-stage liver disease [27] . Therefore, necessitating changes in allocation policies to reduce waitlist mortality [28] .…”
Section: Donor Liver Allocation For Ltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain diseases underlying liver failure necessitate exceptions from the MELD score (Massie et al, 2011). In such cases, novel markers of global liver function are needed and should be compared with the MELD score in individual…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%