“…Mawad and Van Gelder's conclusions from their failure to find photopotentiation in ipRGCs recorded in vitro are primarily discordant with those of previous in vitro studies using heterologous expression of melanopsin (Melyan et al, 2005;Panda et al, 2005;Koyanagi et al, 2005) rather than with previous in vivo results. A previous study from the Seattle group (Zhu et al, 2007) is in agreement with ours (Mure et al, 2007) in concluding that light can, under appropriate conditions, enhance (or photopotentiate) pupil constriction and that this response is melanopsin dependent (although they disagree as to its basis in melanopsin bistablity, suggesting instead a downstream effect). In our view, the most parsimonious explanation, which can account for the broadest range of relevant results, although requiring further confirmation, is simply that melanopsin bistability has functional consequences both in vitro and in vivo.…”