2010
DOI: 10.1186/0778-7367-68-1-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melanoma incidence trends in Limburg after screening and prevention campaigns

Abstract: BackgroundMalignant melanoma is a skin cancer of which the incidence is said to be raising in recent years. Prevention may result in decrease of the incidence. Early detection may result in the detection of earlier stages of the disease. In Limburg a combined campaign of prevention and screening has been performed in recent years and its effects should be evaluated.ObjectivesTo study time trends of malignant melanoma incidence and the evolution of stages of detected melanomas and to relate them to intervention… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, the extended observation time (24 weeks), the number and variety of donor strains (16), the relatively large number of cells per injection site (1e7), and the number of animal subjects per cell strain ( n =6) raise the level of confidence that the frequency of possible mutagenic or neoplastic events was sufficiently low as to be undetectable in the experimental population. However, the absence of tumor detection in this study sample (0/96), does not represent accurately the frequencies of melanoma in the general population, which are approximately 1 in 5,000 individuals (28,33,34,36). A statistical power analysis predicted that conclusive data would require an experimental population of greater than 1 χ 10 7 individuals to show statistically significant differences at the α=0.05 level and powers ranging from 80% to 99%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Rather, the extended observation time (24 weeks), the number and variety of donor strains (16), the relatively large number of cells per injection site (1e7), and the number of animal subjects per cell strain ( n =6) raise the level of confidence that the frequency of possible mutagenic or neoplastic events was sufficiently low as to be undetectable in the experimental population. However, the absence of tumor detection in this study sample (0/96), does not represent accurately the frequencies of melanoma in the general population, which are approximately 1 in 5,000 individuals (28,33,34,36). A statistical power analysis predicted that conclusive data would require an experimental population of greater than 1 χ 10 7 individuals to show statistically significant differences at the α=0.05 level and powers ranging from 80% to 99%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%