“…The strong conservation of the MCH peptidergic system can be explained by the wide range of functions associated with MCH and NEI, which include but are not limited to: ingestive behavior (Georgescu et al, ; Ludwig et al, ; Qu et al, ), energy expenditure (Guesdon, Paradis, Samson, & Richard, ; Segal‐Lieberman et al, ; Shimada, Tritos, Lowell, Flier, & Maratos‐Flier, ), reward (Domingos et al, ; Karlsson et al, ; Mul et al, ), sensory integration (Adams et al, ; Miller, Hruby, Matsunaga, & Bickford, ; Sita, Diniz, Canteras, Xavier, & Bittencourt, ), sleep (Lagos, Torterolo, Jantos, Chase, & Monti, ; Tsunematsu et al, ; Verret et al, ), stress response (Kennedy et al, ; Smith et al, ; Smith et al, ), learning (Adamantidis et al, ; Le Barillier et al, ; Monzon et al, ), sexual physiology (Gonzalez, Vaziri, & Wilson, ; Murray et al, ; Murray et al, ), and maternal physiology (Alachkar et al, ; Benedetto, Pereira, Ferreira, & Torterolo, ; Parkes & Vale, ). As a unifying theory for those functions, we recently proposed that MCH is a homeostatic maintainer, or metabolic dampener, acting to avoid large fluctuations from the baseline by integrating external and internal inputs, and organizing an appropriate response (Diniz & Bittencourt, ).…”