2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melamine-induced novel MSONs heterostructured framework: Controlled-switching between MOF and SOF via a self-assembling approach for rapid uranium sequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 75 Li et al also found that UO 2 2+ could be removed by coordination interactions between UO 2 2+ and carboxyl/amino groups on the MSONs, as illustrated in Figure 4 b. 98 Similarly, the existence of Co-OH groups on ZIF-67 coordinating with uranyl ions was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra, thus explaining the great capacity for the adsorption of U(VI) ( Figure 4 c). 76 Based on the results shown above, functional groups introduced into MOFs played an extremely important role in coordinating with U(VI).…”
Section: Mof-based Materials For Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 75 Li et al also found that UO 2 2+ could be removed by coordination interactions between UO 2 2+ and carboxyl/amino groups on the MSONs, as illustrated in Figure 4 b. 98 Similarly, the existence of Co-OH groups on ZIF-67 coordinating with uranyl ions was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra, thus explaining the great capacity for the adsorption of U(VI) ( Figure 4 c). 76 Based on the results shown above, functional groups introduced into MOFs played an extremely important role in coordinating with U(VI).…”
Section: Mof-based Materials For Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The experiment results indicated that these five coexisting ions with extremely high concentrations (250, 500, and 1000 mg/L) had no essential effect on U(VI) removal by MSONs-5 ( Figure 3 b), which revealed that MSONs-5 could be regard as a powerful adsorbent to capture U(VI). 98 The effect of the coexisting ions (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Zn 2+ ) on the removal of U(VI) by a Cu 3 (btc) 2 encapsulating H 3 PW 12 O 40 hybrid 94 , 101 , 116 materials (HKUST-1@H 3 PW 12 O 40 ) was also investigated. The results showed that the adsorption efficiency of U(VI) did not significantly change in the existence of these coexisting ions, which implied that HKUST-1@H 3 PW 12 O 40 could effectively and selectively adsorb U(VI) from aqueous solution with other metal ions.…”
Section: Mof-based Materials For Uranium Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Melamine is a N-rich chelating molecule, which was investigated in heavy metal capture [ 79 , 80 ]. El-Shall et al studied melamine zirconium phosphate (M–ZrP) adsorbent for the extraction of heavy metals from polluted water [ 81 ].…”
Section: Removal Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the uranium removal rate by sorption is mainly influenced by physical/chemical properties of adsorbents (i.e., pore structure, surface groups), uranium concentration, pH, etc. ( Kataria and Garg, 2018 ) Biochar ( Sun et al, 2013 ; Sun et al, 2017 ; Kong et al, 2020 ), graphene ( Zhao et al, 2019 ), calixarene ( Fang-Zhu et al, 2019 ), MOFs ( Li et al, 2020 ), and mesoporous silicon ( Jiang et al, 2020 ) were used as sorption materials. Among them, biochar has been verified as an important sorption material for uranium recovery or removal from aqueous solution ( Jin et al, 2018 ; Li et al, 2019a ), due to its simple preparation process, lower price, higher temperature resistance, radiation resistance, higher stability to almost all kinds of acidic and alkali environments, nontoxic, and environmentally friendly nature ( Zhao et al, 2017 ; Pu et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%