2009
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mek1/2 gene dosage determines tissue response to oncogenic Ras signaling in the skin

Abstract: Ras genes are commonly mutated in human cancers of the skin and other tissues. Oncogenic Ras signals through multiple effector pathways, including the Erk1/2 MAPK, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), and the Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RalGEF) cascades. In epidermis, activation of oncogenic Ras induces hyperplasia and inhibits differentiation, features characteristic of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The downstream effector pathways required for oncogenic Ras effects in epidermis, however, are un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have focused on the role of ERKs, MEKs, and related kinases in protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation or other feedback mechanisms in these pathways 24, However, our results in HMESO cells illustrate unique roles of ERK1 and ERK2 in gene transcription and function, revealing several ERK2-specific genes that may govern MM cell survival, inhibition of apoptosis, and essential processes (migration, invasion, angiogenesis) involved in the maintenance of tumor homeostasis. Data in Figure 4A showing that inhibition of ERK1 or ERK2 inhibits MM cell proliferation, support some reports suggesting that ERK1 and ERK2 (or MEK1 and MEK2) are interchangeable and functionally redundant, especially in the epidermis 25. However, blocking ERK2 selectively inhibited parameters of tumor function in vitro and growth of epithelioid MMs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Most studies have focused on the role of ERKs, MEKs, and related kinases in protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation or other feedback mechanisms in these pathways 24, However, our results in HMESO cells illustrate unique roles of ERK1 and ERK2 in gene transcription and function, revealing several ERK2-specific genes that may govern MM cell survival, inhibition of apoptosis, and essential processes (migration, invasion, angiogenesis) involved in the maintenance of tumor homeostasis. Data in Figure 4A showing that inhibition of ERK1 or ERK2 inhibits MM cell proliferation, support some reports suggesting that ERK1 and ERK2 (or MEK1 and MEK2) are interchangeable and functionally redundant, especially in the epidermis 25. However, blocking ERK2 selectively inhibited parameters of tumor function in vitro and growth of epithelioid MMs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Most studies have focused on the role of ERKs, MEKs and related kinases in protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation or other feedback mechanisms in these pathways,24 However, our results in HMESO cells illustrate unique roles of ERK1 and ERK2 in gene transcription and function, revealing several ERK2‐specific genes that may govern MM cell survival, inhibition of apoptosis and essential processes (migration, invasion and angiogenesis) involved in the maintenance of tumor homeostasis. Data in Figure 4 a showing that inhibition of ERK1 or ERK2 inhibits MM cell proliferation support some reports suggesting that ERK1 and ERK2 (or MEK1 and MEK2) are interchangeable and functionally redundant, especially in the epidermis 25. However, blocking ERK2 selectively inhibited parameters of tumor function in vitro and growth of epithelioid MMs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, we find in the present study that Mek1 and Mek2 knockout mice display equivalent levels of Erk1/2 phosphorylation upon DMBA/TPA treatment. Furthermore, in another study, we find that activation of oncogenic Ras in mouse skin containing only two of the four Mek1/2 alleles produces equivalent hyperplasia and Erk1/2 phosphorylation regardless of whether the remaining alleles are both Mek1 , both Mek2 , or one of each isoform (21). Together, these results suggest that differential expression of Mek- and Erk-interacting proteins, and not different levels of Erk1/2 phosphorylation, may underlie the difference in tumorigenesis in Mek1 and Mek2 knockout mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%