2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiotic segregation analysis in a t(4;8) carrier: comparison of FISH methods on sperm chromosome metaphases and interphase sperm nuclei

Abstract: Meiotic segregation of a t(4;8)(q28;p23) translocation carrier was determined by two different methods to compare the final results. A total of 352 sperm chromosome complements, obtained after human-hamster in vitro fertilisation, were analysed by whole chromosome painting, and 6590 sperm heads were studied by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Frequencies of alternate, adjacent I, adjacent II and 3 : 1 segregations were, for sperm chromosomes, 35.5, 33.2, 19.9 and 11.3% respectively. For sperm head an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pellestor et al, 1996). However, many other laboratories have confirmed our results of an increase in disomy for chromosome 21 (Blanco et al, 1998;Oliver-Bonet et al, 2001) and the sex chromosomes (Williams et al, 1993;Scarpato et al, 1998).…”
Section: Frequency and Distribution Of Aneuploidy Among Chromosomessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Pellestor et al, 1996). However, many other laboratories have confirmed our results of an increase in disomy for chromosome 21 (Blanco et al, 1998;Oliver-Bonet et al, 2001) and the sex chromosomes (Williams et al, 1993;Scarpato et al, 1998).…”
Section: Frequency and Distribution Of Aneuploidy Among Chromosomessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These differences could be due to the differences found in each one of the reciprocal translocations studied, even though technical differences unique to each method cannot be discarded, as the results obtained by a single sample analyzed by both methods suggest (Oliver-Bonet et al, 2001). Given that both alternate and adjacent 1 segregations distribute homologous centromeres to different poles of the chromosome spindle, it is logical that these are the most frequent segregations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Obtained By Both Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if an interstitial crossing-over occurs, the same phenotype can come from adjacent-1 segregation. Conversely, the YG and YRRG phenotypes, mainly produced by the adjacent-1 segregation, can also come from an alternate segregation in the case of interstitial crossing-over (see for instance [19,24] for details). Therefore, the alternate and adjacent-1 segregation products were considered together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%