2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00449.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiotic drive at the Om locus in wild-derived inbred mouse strains

Abstract: Meiotic drive is an evolutionary force in which natural selection is uncoupled from organismal fitness. Recently, it has been proposed that meiotic drive and genetic drift represent major forces in the evolution of the mammalian karyotype. Meiotic drive involves two types of genetic elements, Responders and Distorters , the latter being required to induce transmission ratio distortion at the former. We have previously described the Om meiotic drive system in mouse chromosome 11. To investigate the natural hist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissues were infused with RNAlater (Qiagen) and frozen at −80°C to preserve RNA integrity until extraction. Whole brain was isolated from mouse pups derived from crosses (DDKxC57BL/6J)F1 X PANCEVO/EiJ, (C57BL/6J X DDK)F1 X TIRANO/Ei and (C57BL/6J X DDK)F1 X ZALENDE/Ei [63] and (C57BL/6J X PERA)F1 X C57BL/6J [64]. These mouse crosses were generated for previous studies and reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissues were infused with RNAlater (Qiagen) and frozen at −80°C to preserve RNA integrity until extraction. Whole brain was isolated from mouse pups derived from crosses (DDKxC57BL/6J)F1 X PANCEVO/EiJ, (C57BL/6J X DDK)F1 X TIRANO/Ei and (C57BL/6J X DDK)F1 X ZALENDE/Ei [63] and (C57BL/6J X PERA)F1 X C57BL/6J [64]. These mouse crosses were generated for previous studies and reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three crosses used as controls in this study, (C57BL/6 3 DDK)F 1 3 C57BL/6, (C57BL/6 3 DDK)F 1 3 DDK, and (C57BL/6 3 DDK)F 1 3 (C57BL/6 3 DDK)F 1 (in all crosses described in this study the dam is always listed first and the sire second unless otherwise indicated) have been described previously (Sapienza et al 1992;Pardo-Manuel de Villena et al 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000a. Some of the crosses involving inbred males have been previously described in our efforts to characterize a meiotic drive phenotype (Kim et al 2005;Wu et al 2005). Briefly, each male was mated to identical (C57BL/6 3 DDK)F 1 females and monitored daily for newborn pups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stated another way, there is no reason to expect selective forces that influence the evolution of chromosome morphology and number—for example, meiotic drive, changes in cellular processes that affect meiosis and mitosis, and processes that underlie karyotypic orthoselection—will optimize organismal fitness (Sandler and Novitski 1957; Terzi 1972; Pardo‐Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001; Kim et al 2005). To the contrary, these processes are capable of driving chromosomal variants to fixation even if those variants are neutral, underdominant, or weakly maladaptive (Pardo‐Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001; Kim et al 2005). Consequently, I interpret θ i in the current study as karyotypic equilibria rather than adaptive optima, on the grounds that if chromosome number evolution proceeds according to an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, chromosome number in each lineage will equilibrate at a stationary distribution with mean θ and variance determined by the relationship between α and σ, irrespective of the causes of chromosome evolution.…”
Section: Modeling the Evolution Of Holocentric Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%