DNA Repair 2011
DOI: 10.5772/25117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiosis as an Evolutionary Adaptation for DNA Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Homologous recombination: Homologous recombination evolved in the prokaryotes because it plays an important role in DNA repair (Bernstein et al 2011;Bernstein et al 1989). Prokaryotes do not alternate between haploid and diploid generations because protein aggregation is not a substantial enough problem for them to benefit from heterozygosity, even under stressful conditions (main text).…”
Section: Appendix A3 Recombination and Simple Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. Homologous recombination: Homologous recombination evolved in the prokaryotes because it plays an important role in DNA repair (Bernstein et al 2011;Bernstein et al 1989). Prokaryotes do not alternate between haploid and diploid generations because protein aggregation is not a substantial enough problem for them to benefit from heterozygosity, even under stressful conditions (main text).…”
Section: Appendix A3 Recombination and Simple Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synapsis: A key step in the evolution of meiosis from mitosis is the synapsis of homologous chromosomes (Wilkins and Holliday 2009). DNA repair proteins seem to have been recruited to assist with the formation of chiasmata (Bernstein et al 2011). The formation of chiasmata may have initially improved the fidelity of recombination (by preventing ectopic recombination for example), but the chiasmata also help homologous chromosomes to properly align, so they can segregate correctly during meiosis and ensure that each daughter cell has a proper karyotype (Bernstein et al 2011;Gorelick and Heng 2010;Wilkins and Holliday 2009;Heng 2007).…”
Section: Appendix A3 Recombination and Simple Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of sex would have enhanced DNA repair yet came with significant costs including the twofold cost of sex (de Visser & Elena, ; Bernstein et al , ; Goddard, ; McDonald et al , ). Intriguingly, sex may have been especially advantageous in dealing with oxidative stress from the endosymbiont that formed the pre‐mitochondrion, as this aerobic bacterium would have generated high levels of ROS (Blackstone, ; Bernstein et al , ; Horandl & Speijer, ). Sex would have been particularly effective in repairing subsequent ROS‐induced DNA damage via homologous recombination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sequences might have been related to the spread of retrotransposons in early eukaryotes, of which many types are very ancient in eukaryotes but absent in bacteria and archaea [27]. Another hypothesis is that pairing and recombination initially arose as a way to repair mutational damage caused by increased oxidative stress due to rising atmospheric oxygen or endosymbiosis [7,[28][29][30]. This scenario presupposes that DNA maintenance is inefficient in the absence of meiosis; however, prokaryotes (including archaea) have efficient repair mechanisms that involve recombination but not meiosis [9].…”
Section: The Origin Of Synapsis and Meiotic Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%