2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11230-014-9488-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meggittina numida n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Catenotaeniidae), a parasite of the Shaw’s jird Meriones shawi (Duvernoy) (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) in Tunisia

Abstract: Meggittina numida n. sp. (Cyclophyllidea: Catenotaeniidae: Skrjabinotaeniinae) is described from the small intestine of the Shaw's jird Meriones shawi (Duvernoy) (Rodentia, Muridae, Gerbillinae) trapped in central Tunisia. The new species can be distinguished from the four other members of Meggittina Lynsdale, 1953 by the high number of proglottids (8-25 vs max. 6) and by the elongated strobila (8.2-60 mm in length vs max. 5.6 mm). M numida n. sp. further differs from M. cricetomydis (Hockley, 1961) in the dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species of the genus Meggittina are known to be parasites of African and Malagasy Muroïde rodents, Nesomyidae, Cricetidae and Muridae (Lynsdale 1953;Wertheim et al 1986;Jrijer & Neifar 2014). While the newly recorded species M. numida (Jrijer & Neifar 2014) was very frequent in our samples of M. shawi of Bouhedma, a second species of the same genus, M. gerbilli, was represented by only one case, which may be an accidental infection although the occurrence of this species in Meriones has been reported before, in M. crassus, and in many Gerbillus species (Wertheim et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species of the genus Meggittina are known to be parasites of African and Malagasy Muroïde rodents, Nesomyidae, Cricetidae and Muridae (Lynsdale 1953;Wertheim et al 1986;Jrijer & Neifar 2014). While the newly recorded species M. numida (Jrijer & Neifar 2014) was very frequent in our samples of M. shawi of Bouhedma, a second species of the same genus, M. gerbilli, was represented by only one case, which may be an accidental infection although the occurrence of this species in Meriones has been reported before, in M. crassus, and in many Gerbillus species (Wertheim et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of the genus Meggittina are known to be parasites of African and Malagasy Muroïde rodents, Nesomyidae, Cricetidae and Muridae (Lynsdale 1953;Wertheim et al 1986;Jrijer & Neifar 2014). While the newly recorded species M. numida (Jrijer & Neifar 2014) was very frequent in our samples of M. shawi of Bouhedma, a second species of the same genus, M. gerbilli, was represented by only one case, which may be an accidental infection although the occurrence of this species in Meriones has been reported before, in M. crassus, and in many Gerbillus species (Wertheim et al 1986). The fact that M. numida was very frequent in M. shawi of Bouhedma, but rare in specimens of the same species from the other two localities, Dghoumes and Sidi Toui (one case in each locality) and totally absent in M. libycus, can be explained by, on one hand, the fact that the intermediate host is not a part of the diet of M. libycus, which strengthens the difference already mentioned in the diet of these two species of rodents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a new catenotaeniid species ( Meggittina numida ) resembling morphologically S. oranensis was described from Meriones shawi from Tunisia (Jrijer & Neifar, ). The new species was not compared directly with S. oranensis , because of the assumption that they represent different genera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Table ). Meggittina numida Jrijer & Neifar, is considered here a junior synonym of Skrjabinotaenia oranensis (Joyeux & Foley, ; see the section Proposed taxonomical changes). Preliminary phylogenetic analyses based on a larger starting material were used as the primary means of identifying tapeworm species, combined with differences in main morphological features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%