2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.681771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megasonic cleaning, cavitation, and substrate damage: an atomistic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, pressures may be of the order of 10 3 -10 4 bars. The range of driving pressures analysed here is the typical operating range of megasonic cleaning devices (Kapila et al 2006;Holsteyns et al 2008;Minsier & Proost 2008;Ahn et al 2009;Keswani et al 2009). An uncontrolled radiation by cavitation bubble fields will result in mechanical failure, when the high peak energies of the radiated sound containing highfrequency components drive unwanted mechanical oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, pressures may be of the order of 10 3 -10 4 bars. The range of driving pressures analysed here is the typical operating range of megasonic cleaning devices (Kapila et al 2006;Holsteyns et al 2008;Minsier & Proost 2008;Ahn et al 2009;Keswani et al 2009). An uncontrolled radiation by cavitation bubble fields will result in mechanical failure, when the high peak energies of the radiated sound containing highfrequency components drive unwanted mechanical oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the SC1 part of this process is the same for all substrates, the additional added pits may be contributed to the cleaning steps which contain ozonated water with megasonic. In this case, the presence of ozone in the water during megasonic cleaning will lead to increased cavitation activity [7], which could be responsible for the additional cleaning induced pits observed during this cleaning process.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pit Creation By Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-known phenomenon that both acoustic cavitation and acoustic streaming play some critical roles in the megasonic cleaning. 1,2 Kapila et al 2,3 reported that acoustic streaming does not induce the force strong enough to damage the substrates or patterns. However, excessive cavitation energy should cause extensive surface damage, particularly to tiny surface features such as SRAFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3,4 Furthermore, it has been reported that cavity size has a wider distribution at fixed megasonic conditions, and SRAFs damages caused by large cavity sizes with large cavitation energy would occur at a certain probability. 3,5 Therefore, it is important to control the distribution of the cavitation energy and cavity size on photomask surface within an adequate range to achieve maximum cleaning efficiency without SRAFs damage. However, a correlation between cavity size distribution, cavitation energy distribution and SRAFs damage still remains much to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%