2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-021-03257-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megarian Variable Actualism

Abstract: Megarian Actualism is the denial of unmanifesting powers. Aristotle called such a view ‘buffoonery’ and dispositionalists have provided compelling reasons for the contrary platitude that powers need not manifest. Even so, drawing on extant treatments of quantitative powers I’ll suggest that many of the powers which feature in quantitative lawlike equations are plausibly interpreted as Megarian. This is because the powers described by such equations are best understood as being directed towards all the values o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the grounding view of powers, powers are properties that fully and directly ground dispositions and hence which are metaphysically necessarily connected with those dispositions. 56 Coates (2021,8357) says that the grounding is 'at least partial' because powers are responsible for dispositions only in conjunction with certain 'partner powers' (Heil 2003;Ingthorsson 2013;Martin 1997; Yates 2016). The problem with this is that quiddities (i.e., paradigm non-powers) could be understood as partially grounding dispositions (in conjunction with governing laws if you are an Armstrongian or the spatio-temporal distribution of properties and facts about possible worlds if you are a Lewisian).…”
Section: Two Views Of the Metaphysics Of Powersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the grounding view of powers, powers are properties that fully and directly ground dispositions and hence which are metaphysically necessarily connected with those dispositions. 56 Coates (2021,8357) says that the grounding is 'at least partial' because powers are responsible for dispositions only in conjunction with certain 'partner powers' (Heil 2003;Ingthorsson 2013;Martin 1997; Yates 2016). The problem with this is that quiddities (i.e., paradigm non-powers) could be understood as partially grounding dispositions (in conjunction with governing laws if you are an Armstrongian or the spatio-temporal distribution of properties and facts about possible worlds if you are a Lewisian).…”
Section: Two Views Of the Metaphysics Of Powersmentioning
confidence: 99%