2016
DOI: 10.1600/036364416x692497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megaphylogenetic Specimen-level Approaches to the <I>Carex</I> (Cyperaceae) Phylogeny Using ITS, ETS, and <I>matK</I> Sequences: Implications for Classification

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carex section Glareosae, comprised of 26 species and two subspecies (Maguilla & Escudero, 2016;Maguilla et al, 2015) with a mainly circumboreal distribution (Figure 1; Egorova, 1999;Toivonen, 2002), is a good model for this study for many reasons: (1) different distribution patterns, from widely distributed species to narrow endemics (Egorova, 1999;Maguilla et al, 2015;Toivonen, 2002) as well as species with unusual distribution patterns such as bipolar or amphitropical (C. canescens L. and C. lachenalii Schkuhr, respectively; Moore & Chater, 1971;Vollan et al, 2006); (2) high sensitivity to climate change due to the arctic distribution of species (Figure 1; Maguilla et al, 2015); (3) enough molecular information to get a well-supported phylogeny reflecting a strong phylogenetic hypothesis for our study group (Global Carex Group, 2015, 2016Maguilla et al, 2015) and (4) accurate and reliable knowledge of species distribution through modern flora treatments (Egorova, 1999;Toivonen, 2002). Despite the absence of specific syndromes for long-distance dispersal in Carex propagules (Escudero, Valcarcel, Vargas, & Luceño, 2008), long-distance dispersal ability in this genus has been F I G U R E 1 Occurrence of species within Carex section Glareosae G. Don (Cyperaceae) following Govaerts et al (2007) using "Botanical countries" as per Brummitt (2001).…”
Section: Study Groupmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Carex section Glareosae, comprised of 26 species and two subspecies (Maguilla & Escudero, 2016;Maguilla et al, 2015) with a mainly circumboreal distribution (Figure 1; Egorova, 1999;Toivonen, 2002), is a good model for this study for many reasons: (1) different distribution patterns, from widely distributed species to narrow endemics (Egorova, 1999;Maguilla et al, 2015;Toivonen, 2002) as well as species with unusual distribution patterns such as bipolar or amphitropical (C. canescens L. and C. lachenalii Schkuhr, respectively; Moore & Chater, 1971;Vollan et al, 2006); (2) high sensitivity to climate change due to the arctic distribution of species (Figure 1; Maguilla et al, 2015); (3) enough molecular information to get a well-supported phylogeny reflecting a strong phylogenetic hypothesis for our study group (Global Carex Group, 2015, 2016Maguilla et al, 2015) and (4) accurate and reliable knowledge of species distribution through modern flora treatments (Egorova, 1999;Toivonen, 2002). Despite the absence of specific syndromes for long-distance dispersal in Carex propagules (Escudero, Valcarcel, Vargas, & Luceño, 2008), long-distance dispersal ability in this genus has been F I G U R E 1 Occurrence of species within Carex section Glareosae G. Don (Cyperaceae) following Govaerts et al (2007) using "Botanical countries" as per Brummitt (2001).…”
Section: Study Groupmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Navarran individuals of C. sylvatica subsp. sylvatica display larger morphological variation than expected for the taxon (Global Carex Group, 2016). The detailed examination of these samples reveals that they show characters, such as a smooth upper side and margins of leaves, and the presence of only a few sparse prickles at the utricle beak, that match those detected in other studied samples of C. sylvatica subsp.…”
Section: Carex Laxula New For the Balearic And Tuscan Archipelagos Anmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The simplest models of nucleotide evolution that best fit the data for each studied DNA region were HKY for 5'trnK, HKY+I for ITS1 and ITS2, and JC for 5.8S region. Characters corresponding to coded indels were analysed Egorova (1999), Luceño (2011), and, modified after the results of this study and Global Carex Group (2016). Synonyms at species level follow Govaerts & al.…”
Section: Molecular Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refining of the database involved nomenclatural updating, detection of synonyms, review of doubtful names and exclusion from the Mexican flora of names of taxa whose presence in the country has not been corroborated. The classification at the subfamily and tribe levels follows Muasya et al (2009a, b) and the circumscription of genera follows Dorr (2014), Larridon et al (2011Larridon et al ( , 2013Larridon et al ( , 2014, Bauters et al (2014), and The Global Carex Group (2015Group ( , 2016. To verify the names of species and authors, the web sites Tropicos (www.tropicos.org) and The International Plant Names Index (www.ipni.org) were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%