2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.7.054018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megahertz-Rate Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Random Number Generators Based on Unambiguous State Discrimination

Abstract: An approach to quantum random number generation based on unambiguous quantum state discrimination is developed. We consider a prepare-and-measure protocol, where two nonorthogonal quantum states can be prepared, and a measurement device aims at unambiguously discriminating between them. Because the states are nonorthogonal, this necessarily leads to a minimal rate of inconclusive events whose occurrence must be genuinely random and which provide the randomness source that we exploit. Our protocol is semi-devic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a more concrete example, for δ = 0.9, the behavior of the optimal USD measurement can only certify 0.15 bit of randomness (computed via a SDP as in Ref. [30]).…”
Section: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a more concrete example, for δ = 0.9, the behavior of the optimal USD measurement can only certify 0.15 bit of randomness (computed via a SDP as in Ref. [30]).…”
Section: Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Ref. [30] assumed a lower bound on the overlap between the prepared quantum states. Moreover, Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without assuming the internal workings of the apparatus used. These self-testing methods originated from ensuring secure cryptography [9] and were then utilized to bound dimensionality [13,14], generate random numbers [15][16][17] and verify quantum computers [18]. In this line, DI tests are typically based on a witness involving linear combinations of observed probabilities so only a specific class of states and measurements can be selftested within this regime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future works will investigate the range for high-dimensional systems and entangled states. We expect the range-based techniques will become a new means for specifying quantum systems and mapping detector response [27], and find their applications in a wide range of quantum information tasks such as cryptography, random number generation [17] and metrology, especially where calibrating measuring apparatus is required in advance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has motivated the development of alternative solutions (see e.g. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]), often referred to as semi-DI (or self-testing), exploring intermediate possibilities between the fully DI setting and the more standard "device-dependent" approaches to QRNG, which require a full characterisation of the devices (see e.g. [19][20][21][22][23][24]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%