2002
DOI: 10.1086/340956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megachannel Extraterrestrial Assay Candidates: No Transmissions from Intrinsically Steady Sources

Abstract: We report new, more sensitive observations of nine of the 11 extrastatistical signals in the Megachannel Extraterrestrial Assay (META). These extrastatistical signals had all the expected characteristics of a transmission from an extraterrestrial transmitter, except that they did not repeat. Cordes, Lazio, & Sagan showed that this lack of repeatability could be explained by the high detection thresholds used in the reobservations of these candidates, combined with interstellar scintillation of intrinsically st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular strategies or proposals for SETI have historically centered on broadcasts by an ETI within particular bands of the electromagnetic spectrum we would consider obvious or desirable (see Sagan & Drake 1975 for examples of recommendations). However, no ostensible signatures of ETI transmissions have been detected in wide radio bands (Latham & Soderblom 1993), nor in narrow bandwidths centered on the hyperfine transition of Hi (Horowitz & Sagan 1993;Lazio et al 2002), nor convenient multiples of this frequency (Blair et al 1992;Lazio et al 2002). The same is true for different atomic and molecular transitions of other substances (e.g., H 2 O and OH: Cohen et al 1980;CO and CN: Davidge 1990;positronium: Mauersberger et al 1996).…”
Section: Philosophies Of Setimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular strategies or proposals for SETI have historically centered on broadcasts by an ETI within particular bands of the electromagnetic spectrum we would consider obvious or desirable (see Sagan & Drake 1975 for examples of recommendations). However, no ostensible signatures of ETI transmissions have been detected in wide radio bands (Latham & Soderblom 1993), nor in narrow bandwidths centered on the hyperfine transition of Hi (Horowitz & Sagan 1993;Lazio et al 2002), nor convenient multiples of this frequency (Blair et al 1992;Lazio et al 2002). The same is true for different atomic and molecular transitions of other substances (e.g., H 2 O and OH: Cohen et al 1980;CO and CN: Davidge 1990;positronium: Mauersberger et al 1996).…”
Section: Philosophies Of Setimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can find the same problem with the SETI Project, which has so far produced no concrete results (Wright 2022). SETI attempts to target specific stars of G and M spectral type, have been unsuccessful as well so far (Lazio et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While this may simply mean that extraterrestrial transmissions were too faint to be detected in these surveys, or that transmissions are not being made near this frequency, an alternative explanation may be that transmissions exist but only have low duty cycles. Weak evidence for the existence of such low duty cycle signals may come from the non-persistent candidate signals seen with Big Ear (Kraus, 1979;Gray & Marvel, 2001) and META (Horowitz & Sagan, 1993;Lazio et al, 2002).…”
Section: Why Send Synchronized Low Duty Cycle Signals?mentioning
confidence: 99%