2001
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software

Abstract: s.kumar@asu.edu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
3,621
0
31

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,418 publications
(3,660 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
3,621
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequences were compared by using BioEdit ( 30 ) and ClustalW ( 31 ). Phylogenetic analyses were performed by using MEGA version 4.0.2 ( 32 ). The sequences of the 9 influenza viruses we studied were submitted to GenBank under accession nos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences were compared by using BioEdit ( 30 ) and ClustalW ( 31 ). Phylogenetic analyses were performed by using MEGA version 4.0.2 ( 32 ). The sequences of the 9 influenza viruses we studied were submitted to GenBank under accession nos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AIV representative sequences used for the alignments were obtained from the GenBank and EMBL database. The phylogenetic trees were constructed by using the neighbour-joining method with Kimura two-parameter distances by using MEGA version 3.1 [23]. The reliability of internal branches was assessed by 1000 bootstrap replications and p-distance substitution model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bootstrap consensus analysis (500 replicates) was carried out to verify the robustness of the topologies obtained by PHYLIP (Felsestein, 1995). The cox2 sequences were aligned using Clustal W (Thompson et al, 1994), and a square matrix based on p-distance and K2P was performed using MEGA 3.1 (Kumar et al, 2001). Phylogenetic analyses at the interspecific level were performed using "maximum parsimony" (MP) by PAUP* version 4.0 (Swofford, 2003).…”
Section: Genetic Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analyses at the interspecific level were performed using "maximum parsimony" (MP) by PAUP* version 4.0 (Swofford, 2003). UPGMA and Neighbour-Joining (NJ) analyses, based on K2P values, were performed using the MEGA 3.1 program (Kumar et al, 2001). The reliabilities of the phylogenetic relationships were evaluated using nonparametric bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein, 1985) for the MP and NJ trees.…”
Section: Genetic Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%