1996
DOI: 10.1080/08985629600000018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mega event as strategy for regional development The case of the 1994 Lillehammer Winter Olympics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been argued that the staging of a sport event does not guarantee that a city or region will automatically experience legacies, in particular, the positive legacies that are sought (Garcia, 2003;Heinemann, 2003;Spilling, 1996). In fact, there are examples of urban infrastructure and sport facilities that have not continued to be used for the public good due to the cost of maintenance (Gold & Gold, 2007).…”
Section: Consideration 2: Legacy As Bestowed or Plannedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has been argued that the staging of a sport event does not guarantee that a city or region will automatically experience legacies, in particular, the positive legacies that are sought (Garcia, 2003;Heinemann, 2003;Spilling, 1996). In fact, there are examples of urban infrastructure and sport facilities that have not continued to be used for the public good due to the cost of maintenance (Gold & Gold, 2007).…”
Section: Consideration 2: Legacy As Bestowed or Plannedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He outlines that for benefits of events to extend beyond sporting success, host cities require "a wellplanned and well-coordinated tourism leveraging strategy" (p. 204). This planning should take into account the event life cycle and the objectives of stakeholders from the host city and relevant regions to be able to maximize opportunities in both the short-term and long-term periods before, during, and after an event (Bramwell, 1997;Chalip, 2003Chalip, , 2004Chalip, , 2006Getz, 2005;Spilling, 1996). A more recent definition provided by Getz (2005) also captures this notion of planning through reference to event leveraging strategies.…”
Section: Consideration 3: Temporal Nature Of Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic impacts are often said to be either temporary (Spilling 1996) or greatest in the 3-5 year period around the event itself (Oxford Economics 2012). On the other hand, economic growth stimulated by public sector investment in infrastructure is said to have a potential opportunity cost in other areas of public and welfare spending (McCartney et al 2010), as found in the case of the Sydney Olympics (Searle 2002).…”
Section: Plausibility: Applying the Evidence For Economic Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in recent years we have seen a burgeoning of research studies focusing on the concept of Olympic impact and legacy (see for example, Cashman, 2002;Gold & Gold, 2009;Gratton & Preuss, 2008;Malfas, Theodoraki, & Houlihan, 2004;Toohey, 2008), and on their empirical manifestation (see for example, Andersen, 1999;Blake, 2005;Giannoulakis, Wang, & Gray, 2008;Gibson, Qi, & Zhang, 2008;Hughes, 2013;Spilling, 1996;Zhou & Ap, 2009), such studies have been underdeveloped in a number of ways. In particular, there has been a lack of longitudinal studies of the development of legacy outcomes or impacts (Karadakis & Kaplanidou, 2012;Tien, Lo, & Lin, 2011); a lack of empirical post hoc evaluations (Giesecke & Madden, 2007;Kirkup & Major, 2006); and a scarcity of studies of impacts in non-hosting regions (see for example, Deccio & Baloglu, 2002;Ritchie, Shipway, & Cleeve, 2009;Walton, Longo, & Dawson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%