2005
DOI: 10.1080/10668920590901167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting the Needs of New Faculty at Rural Community Colleges

Abstract: To determine what attracts faculty to rural community colleges, a qualitative study based on the theory of met expectations was conducted. The faculty members who expressed satisfaction were those who were comfortable living and working in a rural community, enjoyed the challenge of teaching students who varied considerably in their readiness for college-level work, and delighted in their students' accomplishments.In the words of one participant ''if you like it here you will be fine.'' A great deal of attenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the literature suggests that new faculty members are much more likely to be successfully socialized into the profession when they have realistic expectations of what it will entail (Feldman, 1981;Gaff and Lambert, 1996). This also seems to be the case at rural community colleges (Murray, 2005;Murray and Cunningham, 2004).…”
Section: Retaining Facultymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the literature suggests that new faculty members are much more likely to be successfully socialized into the profession when they have realistic expectations of what it will entail (Feldman, 1981;Gaff and Lambert, 1996). This also seems to be the case at rural community colleges (Murray, 2005;Murray and Cunningham, 2004).…”
Section: Retaining Facultymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Yet, along with those frustrations, their academic identities were shaped and inspired by students, reinforcing that there are positive aspects to working in a rural setting. Larger studies mirrored these findings (Murray 2005;Wilson 2000) and reinforced a dichotomy of faculty in rural areas of either lifers or leavers. Yet, the differences were not as clearly delineated as the findings would suggest.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Vander-Staay (2005) suggested a number of reasons that individuals might prefer a faculty position at a rural community college, including the lifestyle and shorter commutes to work. Other authors, however, have stressed that the lack of cultural, social, shopping, and recreational amenities in rural areas creates a disadvantage in recruiting new faculty (Leist, 2005;Murray, 2005;Wolfe and Strange, 2003). The environment of the college is another consideration in recruiting faculty to rural community colleges.…”
Section: The Rural Environmentmentioning
confidence: 94%