2008
DOI: 10.2175/193864708788735475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting Secondary Effluent Standards at Peaking Factors of Five and Higher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auxiliary treatment systems are collocated with the conventional activated sludge facilities pictured on Figure 7, which currently have an average dry weather flow of approximately 38 mL/d (10 mgd). Keller et al (2005) and Fitzpatrick et al (2008) further described these facilities and the first five years of their operation. Similar to the City of Salem case discussed elsewhere in this paper, the auxiliary EHRC facilities at the City of Lawrence provided excellent treatment of wet-weather flows that exceeded the capacity of its biological treatment facilities.…”
Section: Lawrence Kansasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The auxiliary treatment systems are collocated with the conventional activated sludge facilities pictured on Figure 7, which currently have an average dry weather flow of approximately 38 mL/d (10 mgd). Keller et al (2005) and Fitzpatrick et al (2008) further described these facilities and the first five years of their operation. Similar to the City of Salem case discussed elsewhere in this paper, the auxiliary EHRC facilities at the City of Lawrence provided excellent treatment of wet-weather flows that exceeded the capacity of its biological treatment facilities.…”
Section: Lawrence Kansasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bay View Water Reclamation Facility in Toledo, Ohio pictured on Figure 9 has a peak wetweather treatment capacity of 1510 ML/d (400 mgd) and serves a collection system with approximately 30% combined sewers and an average dry weather flow rate of approximately 170 ML/d (45 mgd Work by Fitzpatrick et al (2008) further described the new wet-weather treatment facilities and the initial year of operations. In accordance with the CSO Long-Term Control Plan of the Toledo Waterways Initiative, a two-year performance study was completed in April 2009 that focused on the performance and effectiveness of the EHRC facility (Black & Veatch, 2009).…”
Section: Toledo Ohiomentioning
confidence: 99%