2015
DOI: 10.1002/jaal.382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting Pedagogical Encounters Halfway

Abstract: This commentary offers a critique of literacy pedagogy that focuses solely upon a best practices approach to teaching and learning and argues for a relational pedagogy that relies upon diffractive thinking, reading, and writing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the world is currently being made and unmade, the archives of our body won't escape neoliberalism altogether, but we can actively work to create spaces that intentionally try to offer something different-a space of experimentation, a space of playfulness, and a space of possibilities. As Karen Spector (2015) penned so eloquently, "I am advocating a pedagogy of relational being, which can never be boxed, or distributed, or sold" (p. 448). Fort-building pedagogy is one way to engage in this relational and revolutionary work-or a #playrevolution, if you will.…”
Section: Fort-building Pedagogy: What Happens In the Fort Stays In The Fortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the world is currently being made and unmade, the archives of our body won't escape neoliberalism altogether, but we can actively work to create spaces that intentionally try to offer something different-a space of experimentation, a space of playfulness, and a space of possibilities. As Karen Spector (2015) penned so eloquently, "I am advocating a pedagogy of relational being, which can never be boxed, or distributed, or sold" (p. 448). Fort-building pedagogy is one way to engage in this relational and revolutionary work-or a #playrevolution, if you will.…”
Section: Fort-building Pedagogy: What Happens In the Fort Stays In The Fortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is no coincidence that a research project aiming to illuminate the material‐discursive forces (and literacies) of our world uses graphica, rather than strictly alphanumeric characters to express and present scholarly data, analysis, arguments, and implications. The materiality of reading this and other graphica texts makes something possible in the classroom that is less possible without their presence, including debates about what counts as research, what counts as reading, the ways in which different modes of texts require different ways of reading, and whether or how these teacher education students and Stephanie become something different as a result of the (pedagogical) encounter (e.g., Barad, , ; Spector, ).…”
Section: “Girlhood Deconstructed”: a Graphic Memoir As Expanding Litementioning
confidence: 99%
“…reading this and other graphica texts makes something possible in the classroom that is less possible without their presence, including debates about what counts as research, what counts as reading, the ways in which different modes of texts require different ways of reading, and whether or how these teacher education students and Stephanie become something different as a result of the (pedagogical) encounter (e.g., Barad, , 2012Spector, 2015 ). From where do I read the world?…”
Section: Feature Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Pring (2000) argues that since education presents a highly complex practice, and ESD especially so, there is both a 'pull' for ready-made ESD-activities and a 'push' for sharing what is considered successful. Arguably, this creates an interest among policymakers and practitioners of finding generalisable solutions for ESD in the form of 'best practices' and 'good examples' (Biesta 2014;Spector 2015). Pring (2000), Mochizuki (2008) and Spector (2015) argue that 'best practices' present oversimplified explanations to the 'spreading' of ESD-activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, this creates an interest among policymakers and practitioners of finding generalisable solutions for ESD in the form of 'best practices' and 'good examples' (Biesta 2014;Spector 2015). Pring (2000), Mochizuki (2008) and Spector (2015) argue that 'best practices' present oversimplified explanations to the 'spreading' of ESD-activities. There are risks of designating standardised educational proposals for diverse groups of people that may impose a universalising worldview (De Andrade and Sorrentino 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%