1958
DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001020304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medullary bone of laying chickens

Abstract: EIGHT FIGURESThe clianges in the medullary bone of laying birds offer unusual opportunities for the study of several aspects of bone formation and destruction. Thus the rapid cyclic formation and breakdown of this bone in laying pigeons enabled Bloom, Bloom, and McLeaii ('41) to conclude that the various types of cells of bone are temporary functional states of the same cell. We have continued to study tlie medullary bone of laying birds and have tried to find out whether the cellular transformations are espec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
68
2

Year Published

1959
1959
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition of medullary bone is similar to that of cortical and cancellous trabecular bone; however, the proportional amount of components are different with medullary bone being more calcified, having higher apatite to collagen ratio, and containing more non-collagenous proteins, proteoglycans and carbohydrates in the matrix 7,12,14,15 . This bone tissue type was first described in pigeons 16 , and later in some other species of extant birds, among others in domestic fowl, Japanese quail, duck and ostrich 3,10,11,[17][18][19][20][21] . The amount, microanatomy and distribution of medullary bone can be different in different species of birds as well as in different phases of the reproductive cycle 1,11,17,21,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The composition of medullary bone is similar to that of cortical and cancellous trabecular bone; however, the proportional amount of components are different with medullary bone being more calcified, having higher apatite to collagen ratio, and containing more non-collagenous proteins, proteoglycans and carbohydrates in the matrix 7,12,14,15 . This bone tissue type was first described in pigeons 16 , and later in some other species of extant birds, among others in domestic fowl, Japanese quail, duck and ostrich 3,10,11,[17][18][19][20][21] . The amount, microanatomy and distribution of medullary bone can be different in different species of birds as well as in different phases of the reproductive cycle 1,11,17,21,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This bone tissue type was first described in pigeons 16 , and later in some other species of extant birds, among others in domestic fowl, Japanese quail, duck and ostrich 3,10,11,[17][18][19][20][21] . The amount, microanatomy and distribution of medullary bone can be different in different species of birds as well as in different phases of the reproductive cycle 1,11,17,21,22 . Apart from the controversial results on mice forming medullary bone-like tissues in response to unnaturally high oestrogen doses 23,24 , medullary bone has not been reported in any extant non-avian amniotes 25,26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loss of these structural bone components leads to osteoporosis in laying hens and measurements of trabecular bone volume are used to assess the degree of bone loss (Wilson et al, 1992). Rapid sequential changes from medullary bone resorption to formation occur with each egg laying cycle (Bloom et al, 1958). Ultra-structural and light microscopy studies show that osteoid seams indicating bone formation and resorption lacunae indicating bone resorption, are present on medullary bone, but are very rarely found on trabecular bone (S. Wilson, manuscript in preparation) indicating minimal trabecular bone turnover.…”
Section: Figure 1 77ze Mammillary Layer Of An Egg From a Hen That Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1958; Stauffer et al 1973), and (d) in young, growing animals, the presence of severe calcification defects similar to those observed in rickets and osteomalacia (Bloom et al 1958;Stauffer et al 1973;de Bernard et al 1980;Pettifor et al 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%