2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medroxyprogesterone acetate, unlike norethisterone, increases HIV-1 replication in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and an indicator cell line, via mechanisms involving the glucocorticoid receptor, increased CD4/CD8 ratios and CCR5 levels

Abstract: High usage of progestin-only injectable contraceptives, which include the intramuscular injectables depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM, Depo-Provera) and norethisterone (NET) enanthate (NET-EN or Nur-Isterate), correlates worldwide with areas of high HIV-1 prevalence. Epidemiological data show a significant association between usage of DMPA-IM and increased HIV-1 acquisition but no such association from limited data for NET-EN. Whether MPA and NET have similar effects on HIV-1 acquisition and pathogenes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
8
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike other progestins, DMPA is a potent agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor and could plausibly be immunosuppressive especially at higher concentrations. Maritz et al evaluated direct effects of DMPA and Net‐En on HIV‐1 replication in PBMCs from healthy donors ex vivo and found that DMPA significantly increased HIV‐1 replication by threefold in non‐activated PBMCs from female donors, while similar concentrations of Net‐En had no effect. These findings support the observed differential impact of the 2 progestin‐only injectables on immune cells that is reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other progestins, DMPA is a potent agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor and could plausibly be immunosuppressive especially at higher concentrations. Maritz et al evaluated direct effects of DMPA and Net‐En on HIV‐1 replication in PBMCs from healthy donors ex vivo and found that DMPA significantly increased HIV‐1 replication by threefold in non‐activated PBMCs from female donors, while similar concentrations of Net‐En had no effect. These findings support the observed differential impact of the 2 progestin‐only injectables on immune cells that is reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Since 2016, there is substantial new clinical and in vitro biological and animal data that are largely consistent with increased HIV acquisition for DMPA-IM users via several mechanisms. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] An interesting argument was made in the WHO 2019 guidelines 6 on this issue: ''The GDG recognized that the ECHO trial did not address the etiological or causal question of whether DMPA increases the risk of HIV acquisition when compared with not using any contraception'' followed shortly thereafter by: ''Furthermore, the GDG noted that the high incidence of HIV infection experienced by each contraceptive group during the ECHO trial was similar to the background incidence assumed when designing the trial. This was deemed to be indirect evidence addressing the question, suggesting no increased risk of HIV acquisition among users of these contraceptives compared with women not using any contraception.''…”
Section: What Do the Echo Results Tell Us About The Risks Of Hiv Acqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECHO results for the LNG implant cannot be extrapolated to other methods, including use of LNG in oral contraceptive pills containing estrogen or LNG delivered intravaginally, or etonogestrel implants, due to different pharmacokinetics, doses, and/or progestins. Limited observational clinical data on HIV risk and laboratory data for the two-monthly injectable contraceptive norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) do not raise concerns about an increased risk for HIV acquisition, 4,5,38,39,[66][67][68] unlike results for MPA. 38,39,41,52,67 In observational studies, DMPA-IM use was significantly associated with increased HIV acquisition compared with NET-EN use [aHR 1.32, (95% CI 1.08-1.61)], 5 a result very similar to the DMPA-IM versus LNG implant comparison in the ECHO trial.…”
Section: What Do the Echo Results Tell Us About The Risks Of Hiv Acqumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 However, there are concerns about the safety of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), in particular, amid high rates of HIV infection in this region. 2 Immunological and animal studies suggest an increased HIV susceptibility with medroxyprogesterone acetate, [3][4][5][6] supported by observational studies and meta-analyses suggesting an association between DMPA-IM and HIV incidence. 2,7,8 However, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to show a statistically signi cant increase in HIV acquisition with DMPA-IM compared with the copper intrauterine device (IUD) or the levonorgestrel (LNG) implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%